Background: Paraspinal muscle (PSM) flaps can be mobilized with superficial undermining and lateral release from the thoracolumbar fascia and/or deep undermining and medial release from the transverse processes and ribs. The objective of the study was to compare the effect of the PSM flap technique on drain use, retention, and complication rates.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent spinal coverage with PSM flaps at a single institution from April 2020 to June 2021. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, surgical technique, drain usage, and postoperative complications were analyzed to compare the effects of different PSM flap surgical techniques on postoperative drain use and complications.
Results: Sixty patients were included. Both superficial and deep releases were performed in half (47%) of the cases, while the remainder was split between superficial (25%) and deep (28%) releases. Drains were used less frequently for the deep release (35%) than the superficial (93%) or both releases (96%, p < 0.01). The deep release had shorter mean drain retention time (5.8 days) than the superficial (30.3 days) or both releases (24.8 days, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the techniques in terms of complications. For the deep release, the use of drains was not associated with a reduction in complications (odds ratio 0.91 [0.84 - 0.98], p = 0.97).
Conclusions: In a selected patient population, a "deep release only" PSM flap technique may allow for drainless spinal closure without an increased risk of seroma or other complications.
Keywords: Paraspinal muscle flaps; Posterior trunk reconstruction; Reconstructive surgery; Surgical drains.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.