Considerations for using predictive models that include race as an input variable: The case study of lung cancer screening
- PMID: 37844677
- PMCID: PMC11221602
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104525
Considerations for using predictive models that include race as an input variable: The case study of lung cancer screening
Abstract
Indiscriminate use of predictive models incorporating race can reinforce biases present in source data and lead to an exacerbation of health disparities. In some countries, such as the United States, there is therefore a push to remove race from prediction models; however, there are still many prediction models that use race as an input. Biomedical informaticists who are given the responsibility of using these predictive models in healthcare environments are likely to be faced with questions like how to deal with race covariates in these models. Thus, there is a need for a pragmatic framework to help model users think through how to include race in their chosen model so as to avoid inadvertently exacerbating disparities. In this paper, we use the case study of lung cancer screening to propose a simple framework to guide how model users can approach the use (or non-use) of race inputs in the predictive models they are tasked with leveraging in electronic health records and clinical workflows.
Keywords: Decision framework; Health disparities; Prediction models; Race.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Elizabeth Stevens reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Kensaku Kawamoto reports financial support was provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Methods for Using Race and Ethnicity in Prediction Models for Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2331155. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31155. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37721755 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Prediction Model Versus United States Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria: Reducing Race Disparities.J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Nov;15(11):1738-1747. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 18. J Thorac Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32822843
-
Using Prediction Models to Reduce Persistent Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Draft 2020 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1590-1594. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa211. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 33399825 Free PMC article.
-
The Patient Perspective on Lung Cancer Screening and Health Disparities.J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt B):601-606. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.028. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30947894 Review.
-
Risk-Based lung cancer screening: A systematic review.Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;147:154-186. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 12. Lung Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32721652 Review.
References
-
- Wang RC, Rodriguez RM, Moghadassi M, et al. External Validation of the STONE Score, a Clinical Prediction Rule for Ureteral Stone: An Observational Multi-institutional Study. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2016/April/01/ 2016;67(4):423–432.e2. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.08.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hubbard RA, Pujol TA, Alhajjar E, Edoh K, Martin ML. Sources of Disparities in Surveillance Mammography Performance and Risk-Guided Recommendations for Supplemental Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023:OF1–OF11. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-23-0330 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
