Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov:147:104525.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104525. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

Considerations for using predictive models that include race as an input variable: The case study of lung cancer screening

Affiliations

Considerations for using predictive models that include race as an input variable: The case study of lung cancer screening

Elizabeth R Stevens et al. J Biomed Inform. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Indiscriminate use of predictive models incorporating race can reinforce biases present in source data and lead to an exacerbation of health disparities. In some countries, such as the United States, there is therefore a push to remove race from prediction models; however, there are still many prediction models that use race as an input. Biomedical informaticists who are given the responsibility of using these predictive models in healthcare environments are likely to be faced with questions like how to deal with race covariates in these models. Thus, there is a need for a pragmatic framework to help model users think through how to include race in their chosen model so as to avoid inadvertently exacerbating disparities. In this paper, we use the case study of lung cancer screening to propose a simple framework to guide how model users can approach the use (or non-use) of race inputs in the predictive models they are tasked with leveraging in electronic health records and clinical workflows.

Keywords: Decision framework; Health disparities; Prediction models; Race.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Elizabeth Stevens reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Kensaku Kawamoto reports financial support was provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Assessing the impact of race on inequity and its application to lung cancer screening

Similar articles

References

    1. Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in Plain Sight — Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(9):874–882. doi:10.1056/NEJMms2004740 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang RC, Rodriguez RM, Moghadassi M, et al. External Validation of the STONE Score, a Clinical Prediction Rule for Ureteral Stone: An Observational Multi-institutional Study. Ann Emerg Med. Apr 2016;67(4):423–432.e2. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.08.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang RC, Rodriguez RM, Moghadassi M, et al. External Validation of the STONE Score, a Clinical Prediction Rule for Ureteral Stone: An Observational Multi-institutional Study. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2016/April/01/ 2016;67(4):423–432.e2. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.08.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tice JA, Miglioretti DL, Li CS, Vachon CM, Gard CC, Kerlikowske K. Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. Oct 1 2015;33(28):3137–43. doi:10.1200/jco.2015.60.8869 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hubbard RA, Pujol TA, Alhajjar E, Edoh K, Martin ML. Sources of Disparities in Surveillance Mammography Performance and Risk-Guided Recommendations for Supplemental Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023:OF1–OF11. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-23-0330 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources