Carbonate apatite versus β-tricalcium phosphate for rat vertical bone augmentation: A comparison of bioresorbable bone substitutes using polytetrafluoroethylene tubes

Dent Mater J. 2023 Nov 29;42(6):851-859. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2023-112. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

Abstract

This study radiologically and histologically compared two bioresorbable bone substitutes with different compositions carbonate apatite (Cytrans® Granules; CGs) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) for vertical bone augmentation on a rat skull using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes. This PTFE tube was placed at the center of the skull, fixed with Super Bond, and augmented with CGs or β-TCP granules. Specimens with surrounding tissue were harvested at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively, and radiological and histological evaluations were performed. The bone volume to total volume ratio (BV/TV) of the β-TCP-implanted group was markedly higher than that of the CG-implanted group at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Compared to CGs, β-TCP exhibited the ability to form blood vessels into the graft material for a short period after transplantation, as well as an elevated production of collagen into β-TCP granules during the bone formation process.

Keywords: Carbonate apatite; Picrosirius red staining; VWF immunostaining; Vertical bone augmentation; β-tricalcium phosphate.

MeSH terms

  • Absorbable Implants
  • Animals
  • Bone Regeneration
  • Bone Substitutes* / pharmacology
  • Calcium Phosphates
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene
  • Rats

Substances

  • Bone Substitutes
  • carboapatite
  • beta-tricalcium phosphate
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene
  • Calcium Phosphates