Comparing Half-Dose Photodynamic Therapy with Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for the Treatment of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the anatomic and functional outcomes of half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) and yellow 577-nm subthreshold micropulse laser (SMLT) in treating patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

Design: Prospective, double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Participants: Patients with chronic CSCR confirmed by clinical features and multimodal imaging.

Methods: Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive half-dose PDT or SMLT. The same treatment was repeated if persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) was observed. Treatment responses were evaluated 1 month after treatment and every 3 months until the end point at 12 months.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the complete resolution of SRF on OCT scan at month 12. Secondary outcomes included the changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) as measured by OCT, retinal sensitivity as measured by microperimetry, and vision-related quality of life using the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire.

Results: Between April 2017 and October 2020, 68 patients were recruited. At 1 month after treatment, SRF resolved in 8 (24.2%) of 33 patients receiving SMLT and in 20 (58.8%) of 34 patients receiving half-dose PDT. This increased to 23 (82.1%) of 28 patients in the SMLT group and 30 (90.9%) of 33 patients in the half-dose PDT group at 12 months of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significantly faster resolution of SRF in the half-dose PDT group than the SMLT group (P = 0.016). Both groups showed significant improvement in BCVA (-0.12 ± 0.21, P = 0.005 for SMLT; -0.13 ± 0.12, P < 0.001 for half-dose PDT), CMT (-154.2 ± 105.6, P < 0.001 for SMLT; -140.8 ± 94.0, P < 0.001 for half-dose PDT), and retinal sensitivity (5.70 ± 5.02, P < 0.001 for SMLT; 6.05 ± 3.83, P < 0.001 for half-dose PDT) at 12 months compared with baseline. There was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups at each time point in all investigations except BCVA at 3 months (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: When comparing half-dose PDT to subthreshold SMLT, this study has shown both treatments to be viable options, with half-dose PDT achieving faster anatomic success and functional improvement.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Keywords: Central serous chorioretinopathy; Half-dose photodynamic therapy; Subthreshold micropulse laser.