Higher Responder Rates Observed With Live Participant Assessment Versus Photographic Assessment After VYC-20L Hyaluronic Acid Treatment for Chin Augmentation

Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Apr 4;44(5):527-536. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad348.

Abstract

Background: In an evaluator-blinded, randomized controlled trial, the hyaluronic acid soft-tissue filler VYC-20L injectable gel was safe and effective for correcting volume deficits and retrusion in the chin.

Objectives: The objective of this subanalysis was to compare responder rates obtained with photographic vs live assessments.

Methods: Participants were randomized 3:1 to VYC-20L treatment or a 6-month, no-treatment control period followed by optional treatment. Responder rates (≥1-point improvement from baseline on the validated Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale [ACRS]) obtained with photographic assessments and live assessments at Month 6 were compared. Prespecified subgroup analyses compared responder rates by baseline ACRS severity, filler volume, cannula usage, and investigation site.

Results: VYC-20L was effective for chin augmentation as evaluated with both live and photographic assessments. The ACRS responder rates at Month 6 were 91.8% with live assessments and 56.3% with photographic assessments. Consistently higher response rates were observed by live vs photographic assessment regardless of baseline ACRS severity, filler volume, cannula usage, and investigation site.

Conclusions: Live assessment of ACRS response after VYC-20L treatment resulted in higher responder rates than photographic assessment, supporting the use of live assessment for this indication to approximate real-world clinical practice.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Chin
  • Cosmetic Techniques*
  • Dermal Fillers* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Hyaluronic Acid / adverse effects
  • Photography
  • Skin Aging*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Hyaluronic Acid
  • Dermal Fillers