Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;63(2):377-396.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03270-1. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

Ultra-processed foods, adiposity and risk of head and neck cancer and oesophageal adenocarcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study: a mediation analysis

Affiliations

Ultra-processed foods, adiposity and risk of head and neck cancer and oesophageal adenocarcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study: a mediation analysis

Fernanda Morales-Berstein et al. Eur J Nutr. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the role of adiposity in the associations between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and head and neck cancer (HNC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort.

Methods: Our study included 450,111 EPIC participants. We used Cox regressions to investigate the associations between the consumption of UPFs and HNC and OAC risk. A mediation analysis was performed to assess the role of body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in these associations. In sensitivity analyses, we investigated accidental death as a negative control outcome.

Results: During a mean follow-up of 14.13 ± 3.98 years, 910 and 215 participants developed HNC and OAC, respectively. A 10% g/d higher consumption of UPFs was associated with an increased risk of HNC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.34) and OAC (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.47). WHR mediated 5% (95% CI 3-10%) of the association between the consumption of UPFs and HNC risk, while BMI and WHR, respectively, mediated 13% (95% CI 6-53%) and 15% (95% CI 8-72%) of the association between the consumption of UPFs and OAC risk. UPF consumption was positively associated with accidental death in the negative control analysis.

Conclusions: We reaffirmed that higher UPF consumption is associated with greater risk of HNC and OAC in EPIC. The proportion mediated via adiposity was small. Further research is required to investigate other mechanisms that may be at play (if there is indeed any causal effect of UPF consumption on these cancers).

Keywords: Adiposity; Epidemiology; Food processing; Head and neck cancer; Mediation analysis; NOVA classification; Oesophageal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial interests: TGR is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline outside of this research. The rest of the authors have no financial interests to disclose. Non-financial interests: The authors have no non-financial interests to declare. The authors declare that no funds, grants or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mediation analysis diagram of the counterfactual two-way decomposition of the total effect of UPF consumption on the risk of head and neck cancer and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. All mediation models accounted for potential exposure–mediator interactions and were adjusted for age at recruitment in 1-year categories, sex, sub-centre, education, physical activity, height, smoking status and alcohol intake. The total effect (TE) corresponds to the sum of the pure natural direct effect (PNDE) and the total natural indirect effect (TNIE). Point estimates were obtained by direct counterfactual imputation estimation and confidence intervals were obtained using 1000 bootstrap repetitions. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; UPF, ultra-processed food; HNC, head and neck cancer, OAC, oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Associations between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (in %g/d) and the risk of head and neck cancer and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Hazard ratios per 10% g/d higher ultra-processed food intake. Time of entry was defined as age at recruitment, while time of exit was defined as age at first cancer diagnosis (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or age at last follow-up (i.e. death, emigration, loss to follow-up or end of follow-up), whichever came first. Model 1 was stratified by age at recruitment in 1-year categories, sex, and sub-centre. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for education, physical activity, height, and smoking status. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for alcohol intake. N = 450,111, of which 910 and 215 had head and neck cancer and oesophageal adenocarcinoma, respectively. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; UPF, ultra-processed food
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Associations between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (in %g/d) and head and neck cancer subtypes. Hazard ratios per 10% g/d higher ultra-processed food intake. Time of entry was defined as age at recruitment, while time of exit was defined as age at first cancer diagnosis (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or age at last follow-up (i.e. death, emigration, loss to follow-up or end of follow-up), whichever came first. Model 1 was stratified by age at recruitment in 1-year categories, sex, and sub-centre. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for education, physical activity, height and smoking status. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for alcohol intake. N = 450,111, of which 234, 235, 66, 310 and 65 had cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and oral cavity and pharynx unspecified/overlapping regions, respectively. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; UPF, ultra-processed food

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Monteiro CA, Levy RB, Claro RM, et al. A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing. Cad Saude Publica. 2010;26(11):2039–2049. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2010001100005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, et al. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(5):936–941. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003762. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, et al. The food system ultra-processing. the big issue for nutrition, disease, health, well-being. World Nutr J World Public Heal Nutr Assoc. 2012;3(12):527–569.
    1. Monteiro CA, Levy RB, Claro RM, et al. Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(1):5–13. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010003241. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fiolet T, Srour B, Sellem L, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Sante prospective cohort. BMJ. 2018;360:k322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k322. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts