Identifying dimensions and components of student support system in virtual learning: A scoping review

Soleiman Ahmady; Zohreh Khoshgoftar; Ehsan Toofaninejad; Somaye Sohrabi; Masoumeh Kalantarion; Ormond Simpson

doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_146_23

Identifying dimensions and components of student support system in virtual learning: A scoping review

J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Sep 29:12:332. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_146_23. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Soleiman Ahmady¹, Zohreh Khoshgoftar¹, Ehsan Toofaninejad², Somaye Sohrabi¹, Masoumeh Kalantarion¹, Ormond Simpson³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Education and Learning Technologies, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
² Department of E-Learning in Medical Sciences, School of Medical Education and Learning Technologies, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
³ BSc Hons Dunelm, F.Cert ed London, Independent Consultant, Previously Visiting Professor Open Polytechnic of New Zealand, Previously Visiting Fellow Centre for Distance Education University of London, Previously Senior Lecturer UK Open University, Iran.

Abstract

A student support system (SSS) has a crucial role in the absorption, retention, and success of students in virtual learning. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify and map the available evidence regarding the dimensions and components of the SSS in virtual learning. This study was conducted in accordance with the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for scoping reviews. Our search strategy was based on using search engines, such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, WoS, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The articles were published in renowned medical education journals, including Medical Education, Medical Teacher, and Academic Medicine, and the reference lists of identified and reviewed articles were searched manually. The search results were imported into EndNote X20, and after removing duplicates and screenings, 42 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. A descriptive- analytical approach was employed, including a numerical count of study characteristics (quantitative) and template analysis (qualitative). Five dimensions were identified in the SSS in virtual learning: types of support, domains of support, stages of support, instigating of support, levels of support, and their components and subcomponents. The findings of this study depict a comprehensive roadmap and have an important contribution to the knowledge body of SSS in virtual learning. We suggest system developers, planners, and higher education officials to improve the quality of virtual learning by applying these findings in their planning and decision-making.

Keywords: Student; support system; template analysis; virtual learning.

Publication types

Review