Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical differences among selected individuals with a cleft palate repaired using "The Buccal Flap Approach" during primary palatoplasty compared to aged-matched participants without cleft palate.
Design: Observational, prospective.
Setting: Two regional hospitals.
Participants: A total of 30 adult males consisting of 15 adults born with cleft palate who received the Double Opposing Z-Plasty plus Buccal Flaps (DOZP + BF) repair at the time of primary palatoplasty and no history of secondary speech surgery or orthognathic surgery and 15 adults without a history of cleft palate.
Interventions: All participants underwent MRI to visualize anatomy.
Main outcome measures: Ten velopharyngeal and craniofacial anatomical measures.
Results: No statistically significant differences between groups were observed for velar thickness, velar length, pharyngeal depth, NSBa angle, SNB angle, or levator veli palatini length. Individuals with the DOZP + BF presented with a greater effective velar length (p < .001), greater effective VP ratio (p < .001), smaller SNA angle (p < .001), and smaller maximal velar stretch (p < .001) compared to the control participants.
Conclusions: This study suggests that adult males who received the DOZP + BF repair at the time of primary palatoplasty and no history of secondary speech surgery or orthognathic surgery present with a longer effective velar length and larger effective VP ratio in comparison to the non-cleft group. Future research is needed to compare patients with and without favorable outcomes from multiple surgical types to fully understand how surgical techniques alter the anatomy.
Keywords: MRI; buccal flap; palatoplasty.