Objective: This study aims to determine the occurrence of complications before and after the treatment of facial fractures, as well as the impact of the factors on the treatment results and evaluation of their relationships.
Patients and methods: This is a prospective case-control study comprising 90 patients aged between 18 and 65 with facial fractures. Depending on the treatment method, patients were divided into three groups: those treated surgically using a transcutaneous approach, those treated surgically using a transmucosal approach, and those treated conservatively (control group). Following complications before and after treatment were compared: malocclusions, paresthesias, facial asymmetry, diplopia, and limited mouth opening. The follow-up period after the treatment of choice was six months.
Results: There was a significant reduction in complications after treatment: malocclusion, paresthesia, facial asymmetry, and limited mouth opening. Regarding the transcutaneous approach, there is a substantial reduction in the number of complications after treatment, such as malocclusions (p=0.008), paresthesias (p=0.004), and facial asymmetries (p<0.001). Similar results were obtained for the transmucosal approach. Pain intensity positively correlated with preoperative complications: malocclusion, paresthesias, and facial asymmetry. The range of mouth opening had a negative interdependence with malocclusion before and after treatment with infection, fractura male sanata, malocclusion, paresthesias, postoperative level of mouth opening, and damage to the facial nerve.
Conclusions: There is no difference in the reduction of preoperative and postoperative complications related to surgery when an incision is made through the skin or mucosa. Malocclusions, paresthesias, and facial asymmetry are reduced through surgical methods.