Variability in surgical approaches to hernias in patients with ascites
- PMID: 38049668
- PMCID: PMC11488489
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10598-6
Variability in surgical approaches to hernias in patients with ascites
Abstract
Background: Hernias in patients with ascites are common, however we know very little about the surgical repair of hernias within this population. The study of these repairs has largely remained limited to single center and case studies, lacking a population-based study on the topic.
Study design: The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative and its corresponding Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR) which captures specific patient, hernia, and operative characteristics at a population level within the state was used to conduct a retrospective review of patients with ascites undergoing ventral or inguinal hernia repair between January 1, 2020 and May 3, 2022. The primary outcome observed was incidence and surgical approach for both ventral and inguinal hernia cohorts. Secondary outcomes included 30-day adverse clinical outcomes as listed here: (ED visits, readmission, reoperation and complications) and surgical priority (urgent/emergent vs elective).
Results: In a cohort of 176 patients with ascites, surgical repair of hernias in patients with ascites is a rare event (1.4% in ventral hernia cohort, 0.2% in inguinal hernia cohort). The post-operative 30-day adverse clinical outcomes in both cohorts were greatly increased compared to those without ascites (ventral: 32% inguinal: 30%). Readmission was the most common complication in both inguinal (n = 14, 15.9%) and ventral hernia (n = 17, 19.3%) groups. Although open repair was most common for both cohorts (ventral: 86%, open: 77%), minimally invasive (MIS) approaches were utilized. Ventral hernias presented most commonly urgently/emergently (60%), and in contrast many inguinal hernias presented electively (72%).
Conclusion: A population-level, ventral and incisional hernia database capturing operative details for 176 patients with ascites. There was variation in the surgical approaches performed for this rare event and opportunities for optimization in patient selection and timing of repair.
Keywords: Ascites; Inguinal hernia; Outcomes; Practice improvement; Transplant; Ventral hernia.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
eTEP inferior access with tailored retromuscular dissection for small to mid-sized umbilical hernia repair with or without inguinal hernia: early experience.Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1491-1499. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02649-z. Epub 2022 Aug 13. Hernia. 2022. PMID: 35962875
-
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30209805 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ten-year trends in minimally invasive hernia repair: a NSQIP database review.Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):7200-7208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08217-9. Epub 2021 Jan 4. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33398576
-
Preliminary results of a two-layered prosthetic repair for recurrent inguinal and ventral hernias combining open and laparoscopic techniques.Hernia. 2006 Jun;10(3):253-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0085-3. Epub 2006 Apr 12. Hernia. 2006. PMID: 16609818
-
Systemic and local collagen turnover in hernia patients.Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7):B5265. Dan Med J. 2016. PMID: 27399987 Review.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
