Leveraging Patients' Creative Ideas for Innovation in Health Care
- PMID: 38090879
- PMCID: PMC10938936
- DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12682
Leveraging Patients' Creative Ideas for Innovation in Health Care
Abstract
Policy Points Patients' creative ideas may inform learning and innovation that improve patient-centered care. Routinely collected patient experience surveys provide an opportunity to invite patients to share their creative ideas for improvement. We develop and assess a methodological strategy that validates question wording designed to elicit creative ideas from patients. Health care organizations should consider how to report and use these data in health care delivery and quality improvement, and policymakers should consider promoting the use of narrative feedback to better understand and respond to patients' experiences.
Context: Learning health systems (LHSs) have been promoted for a decade to achieve high-quality, patient-centered health care. Innovation driven by knowledge generated through day-to-day health care delivery, including patient insights, is critical to LHSs. However, the pace of translating patient insights into innovation is slow and effectiveness inadequate. This study aims to evaluate a method for systematically eliciting patients' creative ideas, examine the value of such ideas as a source of insight, and examine patients' creative ideas regarding how their experiences could be improved within the context of their own health systems.
Methods: The first stage of the study developed a survey and tested strategies for elicitation of patients' creative ideas with 600 patients from New York State. The second stage deployed the survey with the most generative open-ended question sequence within a health care system and involved analysis of 1,892 patients' responses, including 2,948 creative ideas.
Findings: Actionable, creative feedback was fostered by incorporating a request for transformative feedback into a sequence of narrative elicitation questions. Patients generate more actionable and creative ideas when explicitly invited to share such ideas, especially patients with negative health care experiences, those from minority racial/ethnic backgrounds, and those with chronic illness. The most frequently elicited creative ideas focused on solving challenges, proposing interventions, amplifying exceptional practices, and conveying hopes for the future.
Conclusions: A valid and reliable method for eliciting creative ideas from patients can be deployed as part of routine patient experience surveys that include closed-ended survey items and open-ended narrative items in which patients share their experiences in their own words. The elicited creative ideas are promising for patient engagement and innovation efforts. This study highlights the benefits of engaging patients for quality improvement, offers a rigorously tested method for cultivating innovation using patient-generated knowledge, and outlines how creative ideas can enable organizational learning and innovation.
Keywords: innovation; learning health systems; patient-centered care.
© 2023 The Authors. The Milbank Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Milbank Memorial Fund.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
What Words Convey: The Potential for Patient Narratives to Inform Quality Improvement.Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):176-227. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12374. Milbank Q. 2019. PMID: 30883954 Free PMC article.
-
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447009
-
Patient-Centered Innovation: Involving Patients in Open Social Innovation.Med Care. 2024 May 1;62(5):314-318. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001987. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Med Care. 2024. PMID: 38498871 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Preferences for Depression and Diabetes Treatment among Adults of Different Racial and Ethnic Groups Who Reported Discrimination in Health Care [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Jan. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Jan. PMID: 38478703 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Evidence Brief: Comparative Effectiveness of Appointment Recall Reminder Procedures for Follow-up Appointments [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2015 Jul. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2015 Jul. PMID: 27606388 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
An Evaluation of a Women's Clinic: The Healthcare and Learning Project of the Functional Unit for Women with Schizophrenia.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;12(15):1483. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151483. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39120186 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America; Institute of Medicine ; Smith M, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM, eds. Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. The National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine Roundtable on Evidence‐Based Medicine ; Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis JM, eds. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press; 2007. - PubMed
-
- Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Free Press; 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
