Race-ethnicity and sex differences in 1-year survival following percutaneous coronary intervention among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries
- PMID: 38091249
- DOI: 10.1111/jep.13954
Race-ethnicity and sex differences in 1-year survival following percutaneous coronary intervention among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries
Abstract
Rationale: Existing literature describing differences in survival following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by patient sex, race-ethnicity and the role of socioeconomic characteristics (SEC) is limited.
Aims and objectives: Evaluate differences in 1-year survival after PCI by sex and race-ethnicity, and explore the contribution of SEC to observed differences.
Methods: Using a 20% sample of Medicare claims data for beneficiaries aged 65+, we identified fee-for-service patients who received PCI from 2007 to 2015. We performed logistic regression to assess how sex and race-ethnicity relate to procedural indication, inpatient versus outpatient setting, and 1-year mortality. We evaluated whether these relationships are moderated by sequentially controlling for factors including age, comorbidities, presence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), county SEC, medical resource availability and inpatient versus outpatient procedural status.
Results: We identified 300,491 PCI procedures, of which 94,863 (31.6%) were outpatient. There was a significant transition to outpatient PCI during the study period, especially for men compared with women and White patients compared with Black patients. Black patients were 3.50 percentage points (p < 0.001) and women were 3.41 percentage points (p < 0.001) more likely than White and male patients to undergo PCI at the time of AMI, which typically occurs in the inpatient setting. Controlling for age and calendar year, Black patients were 2.87 percentage points more likely than non-Hispanic White patients to die within 1 year after PCI. After controlling for Black-White differences in comorbidities, the differences in 1-year mortality decreased to 0.95 percentage points, which then became nonsignificant when further controlling for county resources and state of residence.
Conclusion: Women were more likely to experience PCI in the setting of AMI and had less transition to outpatient care during the period. Black patients experienced higher 1-year mortality following PCI, which is explained by differences in baseline comorbidities, county medical resources, and state of residence.
Keywords: healthcare disparities; percutaneous coronary intervention; socioeconomic factors.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Trends in and disparities for acute myocardial infarction: an analysis of Medicare claims data from 1992 to 2010.BMC Med. 2014 Oct 24;12:190. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0190-6. BMC Med. 2014. PMID: 25341547 Free PMC article.
-
Twenty-Year Trends in Outcomes for Older Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1938. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 30874787 Free PMC article.
-
Young Hispanic Women Experience Higher In-Hospital Mortality Following an Acute Myocardial Infarction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 9;4(9):e002089. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002089. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26353998 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Black and White Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e012101. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012101. Epub 2019 Jul 23. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31331221 Free PMC article.
-
Portrayal of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Popular Film: A Review of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e034222. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034222. Epub 2024 Aug 14. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39140282 Review. No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Almarzooq ZI, Wadhera RK, Xu J, Yeh RW. Population trends in rates of percutaneous coronary interventions, 2010 to 2017. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:1219‐1220.
-
- Al‐Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (orbita): a double‐blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:31‐40.
-
- Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503‐1516.
-
- Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1395‐1407.
-
- Kumbhani DJ, Marso SP. Inpatient or outpatient status for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: doctor, “you gotta let me know, should i stay or should i go?”. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003699.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
