Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 14:7:e44382.
doi: 10.2196/44382.

Web-Based Public Reporting as a Decision-Making Tool for Consumers of Long-Term Care in the United States and the United Kingdom: Systematic Analysis of Report Cards

Kristina Kast  1 , Sara-Marie Otten  1 , Jens Konopik  1 , Claudia B Maier  2
Affiliations

Web-Based Public Reporting as a Decision-Making Tool for Consumers of Long-Term Care in the United States and the United Kingdom: Systematic Analysis of Report Cards

Kristina Kast et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Report cards can help consumers make an informed decision when searching for a long-term care facility.

Objective: This study aims to examine the current state of web-based public reporting on long-term care facilities in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Methods: We conducted an internet search for report cards, which allowed for a nationwide search for long-term care facilities and provided freely accessible quality information. On the included report cards, we drew a sample of 1320 facility profiles by searching for long-term care facilities in 4 US and 2 UK cities. Based on those profiles, we analyzed the information provided by the included report cards descriptively.

Results: We found 40 report cards (26 in the United States and 14 in the United Kingdom). In total, 11 of them did not state the source of information. Additionally, 7 report cards had an advanced search field, 24 provided simplification tools, and only 3 had a comparison function. Structural quality information was always provided, followed by consumer feedback on 27 websites, process quality on 15 websites, prices on 12 websites, and outcome quality on 8 websites. Inspection results were always displayed as composite measures.

Conclusions: Apparently, the identified report cards have deficits. To make them more helpful for users and to bring public reporting a bit closer to its goal of improving the quality of health care services, both countries are advised to concentrate on optimizing the existing report cards. Those should become more transparent and improve the reporting of prices and consumer feedback. Advanced search, simplification tools, and comparison functions should be integrated more widely.

Keywords: long-term care; medical decision-making; nursing homes; public reporting; quality improvement; report cards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of report card elements (shortened for better comprehensibility).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021.
    1. Kumpunen S, Trigg L, Rodrigues R. Public reporting in health and long-term care to facilitate provider choice. World Health Organization. 2014. [2023-11-30]. https://tinyurl.com/3vz2kx6z .
    1. Rodrigues R, Trigg L, Schmidt AE, Leichsenring K. The public gets what the public wants: experiences of public reporting in long-term care in Europe. Health Policy. 2014;116(1):84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.12.012. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168851014000049?... S0168-8510(14)00004-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care. 2003;41(Suppl 1):I30–I38. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301001-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clement JP, Bazzoli GJ, Zhao M. Nursing home price and quality responses to publicly reported quality information. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(1 Pt 1):86–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01306.x. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22092366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources