Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):611-621.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad224.

Using artificial intelligence to promote equitable care for inpatients with language barriers and complex medical needs: clinical stakeholder perspectives

Amelia K Barwise  1 , Susan Curtis  2 , Daniel A Diedrich  3 , Brian W Pickering  3
Affiliations

Using artificial intelligence to promote equitable care for inpatients with language barriers and complex medical needs: clinical stakeholder perspectives

Amelia K Barwise et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objectives: Inpatients with language barriers and complex medical needs suffer disparities in quality of care, safety, and health outcomes. Although in-person interpreters are particularly beneficial for these patients, they are underused. We plan to use machine learning predictive analytics to reliably identify patients with language barriers and complex medical needs to prioritize them for in-person interpreters.

Materials and methods: This qualitative study used stakeholder engagement through semi-structured interviews to understand the perceived risks and benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) in this domain. Stakeholders included clinicians, interpreters, and personnel involved in caring for these patients or for organizing interpreters. Data were coded and analyzed using NVIVO software.

Results: We completed 49 interviews. Key perceived risks included concerns about transparency, accuracy, redundancy, privacy, perceived stigmatization among patients, alert fatigue, and supply-demand issues. Key perceived benefits included increased awareness of in-person interpreters, improved standard of care and prioritization for interpreter utilization; a streamlined process for accessing interpreters, empowered clinicians, and potential to overcome clinician bias.

Discussion: This is the first study that elicits stakeholder perspectives on the use of AI with the goal of improved clinical care for patients with language barriers. Perceived benefits and risks related to the use of AI in this domain, overlapped with known hazards and values of AI but some benefits were unique for addressing challenges with providing interpreter services to patients with language barriers.

Conclusion: Artificial intelligence to identify and prioritize patients for interpreter services has the potential to improve standard of care and address healthcare disparities among patients with language barriers.

Keywords: LEP; artificial intelligence; complex care; health equity; language barrier; non-English language preferred.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to report.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Flores G, Abreu M, Olivar MA, Kastner B.. Access barriers to health care for Latino children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(11):1119-1125. - PubMed
    1. Flores G. Language barriers to health care in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):229-231. - PubMed
    1. Schenker Y, Karter AJ, Schillinger D, et al.The impact of limited English proficiency and physician language concordance on reports of clinical interactions among patients with diabetes: the DISTANCE study. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(2):222-228. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Katz SJ, Welch HG.. Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(8):472-477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson WJ, Candib LM.. Culture, Language, and the Doctor–Patient Relationship. FMCH Publications and Presentations; 2002:61. - PubMed

Publication types