Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 20;11(1):63-72.
doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0075. eCollection 2024 Feb 1.

What's going well: a qualitative analysis of positive patient and family feedback in the context of the diagnostic process

Stephen K Liu  1   2 , Fabienne Bourgeois  3   4 , Joe Dong  5 , Kendall Harcourt  5 , Elizabeth Lowe  6 , Liz Salmi  5 , Eric J Thomas  7   8 , Natalie Riblet  1   2 , Sigall K Bell  4   5
Affiliations

What's going well: a qualitative analysis of positive patient and family feedback in the context of the diagnostic process

Stephen K Liu et al. Diagnosis (Berl). .

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate and timely diagnosis relies on close collaboration between patients/families and clinicians. Just as patients have unique insights into diagnostic breakdowns, positive patient feedback may also generate broader perspectives on what constitutes a "good" diagnostic process (DxP).

Methods: We evaluated patient/family feedback on "what's going well" as part of an online pre-visit survey designed to engage patients/families in the DxP. Patients/families living with chronic conditions with visits in three urban pediatric subspecialty clinics (site 1) and one rural adult primary care clinic (site 2) were invited to complete the survey between December 2020 and March 2022. We adapted the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT) to conduct a qualitative analysis on a subset of patient/family responses with ≥20 words.

Results: In total, 7,075 surveys were completed before 18,129 visits (39 %) at site 1, and 460 surveys were completed prior to 706 (65 %) visits at site 2. Of all participants, 1,578 volunteered positive feedback, ranging from 1-79 words. Qualitative analysis of 272 comments with ≥20 words described: Relationships (60 %), Clinical Care (36 %), and Environment (4 %). Compared to primary care, subspecialty comments showed the same overall rankings. Within Relationships, patients/families most commonly noted: thorough and competent attention (46 %), clear communication and listening (41 %) and emotional support and human connection (39 %). Within Clinical Care, patients highlighted: timeliness (31 %), effective clinical management (30 %), and coordination of care (25 %).

Conclusions: Patients/families valued relationships with clinicians above all else in the DxP, emphasizing the importance of supporting clinicians to nurture effective relationships and relationship-centered care in the DxP.

Keywords: diagnostic safety; patient engagement; relationship-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Adaptation of Roos’ model on “feeling heard” [35] for the diagnostic process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Carayon P, Wooldridge A, Hoonakker P, Hundt AS, Kelly MM. SEIPS 3.0: human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety. Appl Ergon. 2020;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amalberti R, Vincent C. Managing risk in hazardous conditions: improvisation is not enough. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29:60–3. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009443. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell SK, Bourgeois F, DesRoches CM, Dong J, Harcourt K, Liu SK, et al. Filling a gap in safety metrics: development of a patient-centred framework to identify and categorise patient-reported breakdowns related to the diagnostic process in ambulatory care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022;31:526–40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013672. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell SK, Bourgeois F, Dong J, Gillespie A, Ngo LH, Reader TW, et al. Patient identification of diagnostic safety blindspots and participation in “Good Catches” through shared visit notes. Milbank Q. 2022;100:1121–65. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12593. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-Arrigan L, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:509–17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. - DOI - PMC - PubMed