Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Adults Who Died or Were Transferred to Intensive Care
- PMID: 38190122
- PMCID: PMC10775080
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7347
Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Adults Who Died or Were Transferred to Intensive Care
Abstract
Importance: Diagnostic errors contribute to patient harm, though few data exist to describe their prevalence or underlying causes among medical inpatients.
Objective: To determine the prevalence, underlying cause, and harms of diagnostic errors among hospitalized adults transferred to an intensive care unit (ICU) or who died.
Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective cohort study conducted at 29 academic medical centers in the US in a random sample of adults hospitalized with general medical conditions and who were transferred to an ICU, died, or both from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Each record was reviewed by 2 trained clinicians to determine whether a diagnostic error occurred (ie, missed or delayed diagnosis), identify diagnostic process faults, and classify harms. Multivariable models estimated association between process faults and diagnostic error. Opportunity for diagnostic error reduction associated with each fault was estimated using the adjusted proportion attributable fraction (aPAF). Data analysis was performed from April through September 2023.
Main outcomes and measures: Whether or not a diagnostic error took place, the frequency of underlying causes of errors, and harms associated with those errors.
Results: Of 2428 patient records at 29 hospitals that underwent review (mean [SD] patient age, 63.9 [17.0] years; 1107 [45.6%] female and 1321 male individuals [54.4%]), 550 patients (23.0%; 95% CI, 20.9%-25.3%) had experienced a diagnostic error. Errors were judged to have contributed to temporary harm, permanent harm, or death in 436 patients (17.8%; 95% CI, 15.9%-19.8%); among the 1863 patients who died, diagnostic error was judged to have contributed to death in 121 (6.6%; 95% CI, 5.3%-8.2%). In multivariable models examining process faults associated with any diagnostic error, patient assessment problems (aPAF, 21.4%; 95% CI, 16.4%-26.4%) and problems with test ordering and interpretation (aPAF, 19.9%; 95% CI, 14.7%-25.1%) had the highest opportunity to reduce diagnostic errors; similar ranking was seen in multivariable models examining harmful diagnostic errors.
Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to the ICU were common and associated with patient harm. Problems with choosing and interpreting tests and the processes involved with clinician assessment are high-priority areas for improvement efforts.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Protecting Patients by Reducing Diagnostic Error.JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Feb 1;184(2):173. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7334. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38190151 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Frequency, Risk Factors, Causes, and Consequences of Diagnostic Errors in Critically Ill Medical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):e902-e910. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003976. Crit Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31524644
-
Prevalence and Causes of Diagnostic Errors in Hospitalized Patients Under Investigation for COVID-19.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1902-1910. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08176-6. Epub 2023 Mar 23. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36952085 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Errors in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Dec. Report No.: 22(23)-EHC043. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Dec. Report No.: 22(23)-EHC043. PMID: 36574484 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Error in the Critically Ill: A Hidden Epidemic?Crit Care Clin. 2022 Jan;38(1):11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.09.005. Crit Care Clin. 2022. PMID: 34794625 Review.
Cited by
-
Large Language Model Influence on Diagnostic Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440969. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39466245 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-Clinician Diagnostic Concordance upon Hospital Admission.Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):733-742. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788330. Epub 2024 Sep 18. Appl Clin Inform. 2024. PMID: 39293648
-
Artificial intelligence-enhanced patient evaluation: bridging art and science.Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 14;45(35):3204-3218. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae415. Eur Heart J. 2024. PMID: 38976371 Review.
-
Influence of a Large Language Model on Diagnostic Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Vignette Study.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Mar 14:2024.03.12.24303785. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.12.24303785. medRxiv. 2024. Update in: JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440969. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969. PMID: 38559045 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
[Artificial intelligence in intensive care medicine].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Apr;119(3):189-198. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01117-z. Epub 2024 Mar 28. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024. PMID: 38546864 Review. German.
References
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press; 2015. doi:10.17226/21794 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
