Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):594-602.
doi: 10.2337/dc23-1332.

Comparative Effects of Randomized Second-line Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes on a Composite Outcome Incorporating Glycemic Control, Body Weight, and Hypoglycemia: An Analysis of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Effects of Randomized Second-line Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes on a Composite Outcome Incorporating Glycemic Control, Body Weight, and Hypoglycemia: An Analysis of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)

M Sue Kirkman et al. Diabetes Care. .

Abstract

Objective: In Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) (5,047 participants, mean follow-up 5.0 years), differences in glycemic control were demonstrated over time among four randomized therapies added to metformin. Weight gain and hypoglycemia are also important outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes. We compared the effects of the four randomized GRADE medications on a composite outcome incorporating glycemic deterioration, weight gain, and hypoglycemia.

Research design and methods: The composite outcome was time to first occurrence of any of the following: HbA1c >7.5%, confirmed; ≥5% weight gain; or severe or recurrent nonsevere hypoglycemia. Secondary analyses included examination of individual components of the composite outcome, subgroup effects and potential mediators, and treatment satisfaction. Cumulative incidence was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess pairwise group differences in risk of an outcome.

Results: Risk of reaching the composite outcome (events per 100 participants per treatment year [PTYs]) was lowest with liraglutide (19 per 100 PTYs) followed by sitagliptin (26 per 100 PTYs), glargine (29 per 100 PTYs), and glimepiride (40 per 100 PTYs); all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. The order was the same for risk of weight gain and hypoglycemia, but risk of glycemic deterioration was lowest with glargine, followed by liraglutide, glimepiride, and sitagliptin. No significant heterogeneity in risk of composite outcome was detected across prespecified covariates. Participants who reached the composite outcome had modestly but significantly lower treatment satisfaction.

Conclusions: Among participants treated with common second-line drug classes for type 2 diabetes, the liraglutide group had the lowest and glimepiride the highest risk of reaching a composite outcome encompassing glycemic deterioration, weight gain, and hypoglycemia. These findings may inform decision-making regarding type 2 diabetes therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Duality of Interest. W.T.G. has served as a consultant on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl Health, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inogen, and Merck and as a site principal investigator for multicentered clinical trials sponsored by his university and funded by Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Epitomee Medical, and Pfizer. R.P.-B. received grant support to the University of Michigan from Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, and Dexcom and served as a consultant on advisory boards for Averitas Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lexicon, Nevro, Novo Nordisk, Procter & Gamble, and Roche. M.S. has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Neurocrine Biosciences and receives grant funding to his institution from Neurocrine Biosciences. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Similar articles

References

    1. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al. ; American Diabetes Association . 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care 2023;46(Suppl. 1):S140–S157 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, et al. . Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2022;45:2753–2786 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Kahn SE, et al. ; GRADE Study Research Group . Rationale and design of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE). Diabetes Care 2013;36:2254–2261 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Balasubramanyam A, et al.; GRADE Study Research Group. Glycemia reduction in type 2 diabetes - glycemic outcomes. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1063–1074 - PMC - PubMed
    1. GRADE Study Research Group ; Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Bebu I. Glycemia reduction in type 2 diabetes - microvascular and cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1075–1088 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types