Comparative Effects of Randomized Second-line Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes on a Composite Outcome Incorporating Glycemic Control, Body Weight, and Hypoglycemia: An Analysis of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
- PMID: 38194519
- PMCID: PMC10973908
- DOI: 10.2337/dc23-1332
Comparative Effects of Randomized Second-line Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes on a Composite Outcome Incorporating Glycemic Control, Body Weight, and Hypoglycemia: An Analysis of the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE)
Abstract
Objective: In Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) (5,047 participants, mean follow-up 5.0 years), differences in glycemic control were demonstrated over time among four randomized therapies added to metformin. Weight gain and hypoglycemia are also important outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes. We compared the effects of the four randomized GRADE medications on a composite outcome incorporating glycemic deterioration, weight gain, and hypoglycemia.
Research design and methods: The composite outcome was time to first occurrence of any of the following: HbA1c >7.5%, confirmed; ≥5% weight gain; or severe or recurrent nonsevere hypoglycemia. Secondary analyses included examination of individual components of the composite outcome, subgroup effects and potential mediators, and treatment satisfaction. Cumulative incidence was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess pairwise group differences in risk of an outcome.
Results: Risk of reaching the composite outcome (events per 100 participants per treatment year [PTYs]) was lowest with liraglutide (19 per 100 PTYs) followed by sitagliptin (26 per 100 PTYs), glargine (29 per 100 PTYs), and glimepiride (40 per 100 PTYs); all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. The order was the same for risk of weight gain and hypoglycemia, but risk of glycemic deterioration was lowest with glargine, followed by liraglutide, glimepiride, and sitagliptin. No significant heterogeneity in risk of composite outcome was detected across prespecified covariates. Participants who reached the composite outcome had modestly but significantly lower treatment satisfaction.
Conclusions: Among participants treated with common second-line drug classes for type 2 diabetes, the liraglutide group had the lowest and glimepiride the highest risk of reaching a composite outcome encompassing glycemic deterioration, weight gain, and hypoglycemia. These findings may inform decision-making regarding type 2 diabetes therapy.
© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Glycemia Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes - Glycemic Outcomes.N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1063-1074. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200433. N Engl J Med. 2022. PMID: 36129996 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative Effects of Glucose-Lowering Medications on Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: The GRADE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jul 1;183(7):705-714. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1487. JAMA Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37213109 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Emulating the GRADE trial using real world data: retrospective comparative effectiveness study.BMJ. 2022 Oct 3;379:e070717. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070717. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 36191949 Free PMC article.
-
Drug Class Review: Newer Diabetes Medications, TZDs, and Combinations: Final Original Report [Internet].Portland (OR): Oregon Health & Science University; 2011 Feb. Portland (OR): Oregon Health & Science University; 2011 Feb. PMID: 21595121 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15 Suppl 1:77-86. doi: 10.3310/hta15suppl1/09. Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21609656 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- U01 DK119083/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000445/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U01DK098246/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002529/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002541/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000439/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK020541/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002378/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK020572/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002243/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002345/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002548/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U34 DK088043/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002537/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK092926/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002535/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK072476/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK079626/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001409/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK098246/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001449/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002489/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U54 GM104940/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001108/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001425/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UM1 TR004528/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000170/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001102/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK017047/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- CC/CDC HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
