Background Fluoroscopy is an imaging modality associated with a wide range of dose levels, characterized using a variety of dose metrics, including effective dose. However, for clinical procedures, effective dose is a seldom-used and unregulated metric in the United States, and thus, it is not extensively studied in radiology despite potentially large clinical implications for patients, especially children and infants. Purpose To formulate and report a dose catalog across all diagnostic and interventional radiology (IR) fluoroscopy examination or procedure types at a specialized tertiary care pediatric hospital. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, dose metrics taken from radiation dose structured reports of fluoroscopy between October 2014 and March 2023 were analyzed. The reports included fluoroscopy across 18 diagnostic examination types and 24 IR procedure types. The National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for Radiography and Fluoroscopy Monte Carlo software was used to estimate age-specific effective dose from dose-area product (DAP). The DAP-to-effective dose conversion factors were estimated per IR procedure type and diagnostic fluoroscopy examination type based on age. Results A total of 11 536 individual diagnostic fluoroscopy examinations (18 types) and 8017 individual IR procedures (24 types) were analyzed. Median effective dose values per diagnostic fluoroscopy examination type ranged from 0.0010 to 0.44 mSv (mean, 0.0808 mSv ± 0.0998 [SD]). Calculated DAP-to-effective dose conversion factors ranged from 0.04 to 2.48 mSv/Gy · cm2 (mean, 0.758 mSv/Gy · cm2 ± 0.614) across all diagnostic fluoroscopy examination types. Median effective dose values per IR procedure type ranged from 0.0007 to 3.90 mSv (mean, 0.6757 mSv ± 0.8989). Calculated DAP-to-effective dose conversion factors ranged from 0.001 to 0.87 mSv/Gy · cm2 (mean, 0.210 mSv/Gy · cm2 ± 0.235) across all IR procedure types. Conclusion A pediatric fluoroscopy dose catalog was created, including age-specific effective dose, using a repeatable robust method based on accurate clinical data. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Borrego and Balter in this issue.