Aims: Most studies that use the NIH Toolbox 2-Minute Walk Test with young children, modify the protocol, compromising the generalizability of outcomes. A standardizable protocol is needed. The purpose of this study was to compare the 2MWT performance of children ages 3-6 years on the standard NIH Toolbox protocol and on a modified protocol designed to support young children.
Methods: Cross-over randomized controlled trial. Fifteen typically developing children ages 3-6 years were randomly assigned to the performance order of the NIH toolbox 2MWT protocol and the Modified Accessibility Path (MAP) 2MWT protocol. Outcome variables and statistical analyses included test completion (McNemar test), distance walked (Wilcoxon signed-rank test), and accuracy (general estimating equation model with Poisson distribution).
Results: All children completed 2 min of walking with the MAP protocol. Only 40% of children completed the NIH Toolbox protocol, with 83% of these NIH completers bolstered by previous exposure to the MAP protocol. Collapsed across the order, children also had significantly fewer errors per lap with the MAP protocol (p < 0.0001), despite walking a significantly greater distance (p = 0.006).
Conclusions: These findings lend preliminary support for standardized application of a 2MWT with young children when the protocol is designed to be child-friendly.
Keywords: 2-Minute Walk Test; Child; development; endurance; exercise test.