A comparison of nutrient-based and exchange-group methods of diet instruction for patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes

Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Mar;45(3):625-37. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/45.3.625.

Abstract

This study compared effectiveness of nutrient-based (Diet Guide) vs food-group (Exchange Lists) methods of diabetic diet evaluation in improving dietary compliance, glycemic control, and biochemical indicators of heart disease risk. Eighty-three persons with noninsulin-dependent diabetes were taught one of two diet-planning methods in a 3-session workshop. Both methods led to reductions in energy intake and percent of calories from fat and saturated fatty acids in 6 mo postworkshop. Reductions in fat intake were greater and more long lasting for persons using Diet Guide than using Exchange Lists method of diet planning. Despite dietary changes, neither diet-planning method led to significant decreases in weight or skinfold thickness. Few differences were seen in clinical measurements pre- and 6 mo postworkshop. Total and LDL cholesterol values were lower than preworkshop values for men in both groups. Suggestions are given for improving effectiveness of both diet-planning methods.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anthropometry
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / diet therapy*
  • Diet, Diabetic / education*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Compliance