'Assisted dying' as a comforting heteronomy: the rejection of self-administration in the purported act of self-determination

New Bioeth. 2024 Jan 30:1-20. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2024.2307698. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

'Assisted dying' (an umbrella term for euthanasia and/or assisted suicide) is frequently defended as an act of autonomous self-determination in death but, given a choice, between 93.3% and 100% of patients are reluctant to self-administer (median 99.5%). If required to self-administer, fewer patients request assisted death and, of these, a sizable proportion do not self-administer but die of natural causes. This manifest avoidance runs counter to the concept of autonomous self-determination, even on the supposition that suicide could truly be autonomous. The avoidance of self-administration does not show that self-administration, when it occurs, is necessarily autonomous. It suggests, rather, that there are other frames by which assisted dying is being understood. One such is desire for medical control, a desire shared by patients and doctors. Such a frame is not directed towards an exacting autonomy (self-directed action by the patient) but towards a comforting heteronomy (letting the doctor take control).

Keywords: Assisted dying; assisted suicide; autonomy; euthanasia; heteronomy; self-administration.