Trends in Psychological Distress and Outpatient Mental Health Care of Adults During the COVID-19 Era
- PMID: 38316009
- DOI: 10.7326/M23-2824
Trends in Psychological Distress and Outpatient Mental Health Care of Adults During the COVID-19 Era
Abstract
Background: In addition to the physical disease burden of the COVID-19 pandemic, concern exists over its adverse mental health effects.
Objective: To characterize trends in psychological distress and outpatient mental health care among U.S. adults from 2018 to 2021 and to describe patterns of in-person, telephone, and video outpatient mental health care.
Design: Cross-sectional nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults.
Setting: United States.
Participants: Adults included in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component, 2018 to 2021 (n = 86 658).
Measurements: Psychological distress was measured with the Kessler-6 scale (range of 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe distress), with a score of 13 or higher defined as serious psychological distress, 1 to 12 as less serious distress, and 0 as no distress. Outpatient mental health care use was measured via computer-assisted personal interviews.
Results: Between 2018 and 2021, the rate of serious psychological distress among adults increased from 3.5% to 4.2%. Although the rate of outpatient mental health care increased from 11.2% to 12.4% overall, the rate decreased from 46.5% to 40.4% among adults with serious psychological distress. When age, sex, and distress were controlled for, a significant increase in outpatient mental health care was observed for young adults (aged 18 to 44 years) but not middle-aged (aged 45 to 64 years) and older (aged >65 years) adults and for employed adults but not unemployed adults. In 2021, 33.4% of mental health outpatients received at least 1 video visit, including a disproportionate percentage of young, college-educated, higher-income, employed, and urban adults.
Limitation: Information about outpatient mental health service modality (in-person, video, telephone) was first fully available in the 2021 survey.
Conclusion: These trends and patterns underscore the persistent challenges of connecting older adults, unemployed persons, and seriously distressed adults to outpatient mental health care and the difficulties faced by older, less educated, lower-income, unemployed, and rural patients in accessing outpatient mental health care via video.
Primary funding source: None.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Trends in Serious Psychological Distress and Outpatient Mental Health Care of US Adults.JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):152-161. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3550. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30484838 Free PMC article.
-
Income or Job Loss and Psychological Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424601. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24601. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39078628 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological distress and trends in healthcare expenditures and outpatient healthcare.Am J Manag Care. 2011 May;17(5):319-28. Am J Manag Care. 2011. PMID: 21718079 Free PMC article.
-
Mental distress among U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.J Clin Psychol. 2020 Dec;76(12):2170-2182. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23064. Epub 2020 Oct 9. J Clin Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33037608 Free PMC article.
-
Suicidal Ideation and Predictors of Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Eswatini: A Population-Based Household Telephone Survey.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136700. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34206339 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Core Mental Health Clinician Capacity and Use Rates in the US Military.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2434246. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34246. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39292458 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical