Differential Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments in Communities with Higher Shares of Marginalized Populations
- PMID: 38319498
- PMCID: PMC11116315
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08655-4
Differential Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments in Communities with Higher Shares of Marginalized Populations
Abstract
Background: Medicare's voluntary bundled payment programs have demonstrated generally favorable results. However, it remains unknown whether uneven hospital participation in these programs in communities with greater shares of minorities and patients of low socioeconomic status results in disparate access to practice redesign innovations.
Objective: Examine whether communities with higher proportions of marginalized individuals were less likely to be served by a hospital participating in Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-Advanced).
Design: Cross-sectional study using ordinary least squares regression controlling for patient and community factors.
Participants: Medicare fee-for-service patients enrolled from 2015-2017 (pre-BPCI-Advanced) and residing in 2,058 local communities nationwide defined by Hospital Service Areas (HSAs). Each community's share of marginalized patients was calculated separately for each of the share of beneficiaries of Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, or dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid.
Main measures: Dichotomous variable indicating whether a given community had at least one hospital that ever participated in BPCI-Advanced from 2018-2022.
Key results: Communities with higher shares of dual-eligible individuals were less likely to be served by a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced than communities with the lowest quartile of dual-eligible individuals (Q4: -15.1 percentage points [pp] lower than Q1, 95% CI: -21.0 to -9.1, p < 0.001). There was no consistent significant relationship between community proportion of Black beneficiaries and likelihood of having a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced. Communities with higher shares of Hispanic beneficiaries were more likely to have a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced than those in the lowest quartile (Q4: 19.2 pp higher than Q1, 95% CI: 13.4 to 24.9, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Communities with greater shares of dual-eligible beneficiaries, but not racial or ethnic minorities, were less likely to be served by a hospital participating in BPCI-Advanced Policymakers should consider approaches to incentivize more socioeconomically uniform participation in voluntary bundled payments.
Keywords: alternative payment models; bundled payments; health equity.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Navathe reports grants from Hawaii Medical Service Association, grants from Commonwealth Fund, grants from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, grants from Donaghue Foundation, grants from the Veterans Affairs Administration*, grants from Arnold Ventures, grants from United Healthcare, grants from Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC, grants from Humana, personal fees from Navvis Healthcare, personal fees from Elsevier Press, personal fees from Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, personal fees from Analysis Group, personal fees from Advocate Physician Partners, personal fees from the Federal Trade Commission, personal fees from Catholic Health Services Long Island, and equity from Clarify Health, personal fees and board membership for The Scan Group, and non-compensated board membership for Integrated Services, Inc. outside the submitted work in the past 3 years. Dr. Liao reports honoraria from Marcus Evans, Comagine Health, and Brown University outside the submitted work. Dr. Neville reports payments from the Commonwealth Fund and the Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority of Australia and consulting fees from Capadev LLP. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The Proportion of Marginalized Individuals in US Communities and Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments.Popul Health Manag. 2022 Aug;25(4):501-508. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0334. Epub 2022 May 9. Popul Health Manag. 2022. PMID: 35532549 Free PMC article.
-
How Do Frail Medicare Beneficiaries Fare Under Bundled Payments?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Nov;67(11):2245-2253. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16147. Epub 2019 Sep 6. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019. PMID: 31490547
-
Factors Associated With Participation in Cardiac Episode Payments Included in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):761-766. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1736. JAMA Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29955882 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Bundled Payments and Health Care Reform as Alternative Payment Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Clinical Review.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2590-2597. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 20. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28438453 Review.
-
Life After BPCI: High Quality Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Care Can Still Exist Outside of a Bundled Payment Program.J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7):1241-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.083. Epub 2022 Feb 26. J Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35227815 Review.
References
-
- What Are Bundled Payments? NEJM Catalyst. 2018. 10.1056/CAT.18.0247
-
- Joynt Maddox KE, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Evaluation of Medicare’s Bundled Payments Initiative for Medical Conditions. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(3):260-269.10.1056/NEJMsa1801569. - PubMed
-
- CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model: Third Evaluation Report. Lewin Group 2022:1–84. Accessed January 14, 2023. https://innovation.cms.gov/data-and-reports/2022/bpci-adv-ar3.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
