Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;18(1):14-30.
doi: 10.1177/15586898221149470. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

Integrating Transformative Considerations and Quantitative Results through a Participant Selection Joint Display in Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Studies

Tyler G James  1 , Melissa DeJonckheere  1 , Timothy C Guetterman  1
Affiliations

Integrating Transformative Considerations and Quantitative Results through a Participant Selection Joint Display in Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Studies

Tyler G James et al. J Mix Methods Res. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Integrating philosophical or paradigmatic dimensions in mixed methods research studies facilitates the development of stronger meta-inferences. The transformative paradigm and the explanatory sequential mixed methods design share a focus on developing sampling criteria, but with different priorities. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by presenting a method of integrating transformative sampling considerations in explanatory sequential designs through a participant selection joint display. The approach presented addresses concerns regarding transparency of research decisions in mixed methods studies, while providing a method of centering the transformative paradigm in mixed methods integration procedures.

Keywords: integration; joint display; mixed methods; transformative paradigm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Camacho S (2020). From theory to practice: Operationalizing transformative mixed methods with and for the studied population. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 305–335. https://doi.org/10/gnz8bb
    1. Canales G (2013). Transformative, mixed methods checklist for psychological research with Mexican Americans. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10/gnz8dp
    1. Cottler LB, Striley CW, O’leary C, Ruktanonchai C, & Wilhelm K (2013). Engaging the community in research with the HealthStreet model: National and international perspectives. In Translational Medicine-What, Why and How: An International Perspective (Vol. 3, pp. 98–109). Karger Publishers.
    1. Creswell JW, & Plano Clark VL (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
    1. DeJonckheere M, Lindquist-Grantz R, Toraman S, Haddad K, & Vaughn LM (2018). Intersection of mixed methods and community-based participatory research: A methodological review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1558689818778469. 10.1177/1558689818778469 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources