Almond supplementation on appetite measures, body weight, and body composition in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 37 randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 38351580
- DOI: 10.1111/obr.13711
Almond supplementation on appetite measures, body weight, and body composition in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 37 randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background and objective: Almond consumption has an inverse relationship with obesity and factors related to metabolic syndrome. However, the results of available clinical trials are inconsistent. Therefore, we analyzed the results of 37 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and evaluated the association of almond consumption with subjective appetite scores and body compositions.
Methods: Net changes in bodyweight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), fat mass (FM), body fat percent, fat-free mass (FFM), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subjective appetite scores were used to calculate the effect size, which was reported as a weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: This meta-analysis was performed on 37 RCTs with 43 treatment arms. The certainty in the evidence was very low for appetite indices, body fat percent, FFM, VAT, and WHR, and moderate for other parameters as assessed by the GRADE evidence profiles. Pooled effect sizes indicated a significant reducing effect of almond consumption on body weight (WMD: -0.45 kg, 95% CI: -0.85, -0.05, p = 0.026), WC (WMD: -0.66 cm, 95% CI: -1.27, -0.04, p = 0.037), FM (WMD: -0.66 kg, 95% CI: -1.16, -0.17, p = 0.009), and hunger score (WMD: -1.15 mm, 95% CI: -1.98, -0.32, p = 0.006) compared with the control group. However, almond did not have a significant effect on BMI (WMD: -0.20 kg m-2, 95% CI: -0.46, 0.05, p = 0.122), body fat percent (WMD: -0.39%, 95% CI: -0.93, 0.14, p = 0.154), FFM (WMD: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.47, 0.34, p = 0.748), WHR (WMD: -0.04, 95% CI: -0.12, 0.02, p = 0.203), VAT (WMD: -0.33 cm, 95% CI: -0.99, 0.32), fullness (WMD: 0.46 mm, 95% CI: -0.95, 1.88), desire to eat (WMD: 0.98 mm, 95% CI: -4.13, 2.23), and prospective food consumption (WMD: 1.08 mm, 95% CI: -2.11, 4.28). Subgroup analyses indicated that consumption of ≥50 g almonds per day resulted in a significant and more favorable improvement in bodyweight, WC, FM, and hunger score. Body weight, WC, FM, body fat percent, and hunger scores were decreased significantly in the trials that lasted for ≥12 weeks and in the subjects with a BMI < 30 kg/m2. Furthermore, a significant reduction in body weight and WC was observed in those trials that used a nut-free diet as a control group, but not in those using snacks and other nuts. The results of our analysis suggest that almond consumption may significantly improve body composition indices and hunger scores when consumed at a dose of ≥50 g/day for ≥12 weeks by individuals with a BMI < 30 kg/m2.
Conclusion: However, further well-constructed randomized clinical trials are needed in order ascertain the outcome of our analysis.
Keywords: Prunus dulcis; almonds; body mass index; body weight; fat‐free mass; obesity.
© 2024 World Obesity Federation.
Similar articles
-
The effect of almond intake on anthropometric indices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Food Funct. 2020 Sep 23;11(9):7340-7355. doi: 10.1039/d0fo00470g. Food Funct. 2020. PMID: 32857083
-
Ginger intervention on body weight and body composition in adults: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials.Nutr Rev. 2024 Dec 1;82(12):1651-1665. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad149. Nutr Rev. 2024. PMID: 38261398
-
The effect of ketogenic diet on body composition and anthropometric measures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(13):3644-3657. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1867957. Epub 2021 Jan 14. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022. PMID: 33443451
-
Beneficial effects of the probiotics and synbiotics supplementation on anthropometric indices and body composition in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obes Rev. 2024 Mar;25(3):e13667. doi: 10.1111/obr.13667. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Obes Rev. 2024. PMID: 38030409 Review.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Almond Clinical Trials on Weight Measures, Metabolic Health Biomarkers and Outcomes, and the Gut Microbiota.Nutrients. 2021 Jun 8;13(6):1968. doi: 10.3390/nu13061968. Nutrients. 2021. PMID: 34201139 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aggarwal BB. Targeting inflammation‐induced obesity and metabolic diseases by curcumin and other nutraceuticals. Annu Rev Nutr. 2010;30(1):173‐199. doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.012809.104755
-
- Digenio AG, Mancuso JP, Gerber RA, Dvorak RV. Comparison of methods for delivering a lifestyle modification program for obese patients: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(4):255‐262. doi:10.7326/0003‐4819‐150‐4‐200902170‐00006
-
- Strychar I. Diet in the management of weight loss. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(1):56‐63. doi:10.1503/cmaj.045037
-
- Thomas SL, Hyde J, Karunaratne A, Kausman R, Komesaroff PA. “They all work… when you stick to them”: a qualitative investigation of dieting, weight loss, and physical exercise, in obese individuals. Nutr J. 2008;7(1):34. doi:10.1186/1475‐2891‐7‐34
-
- Kris‐Etherton PM, Hu FB, Ros E, Sabaté J. The role of tree nuts and peanuts in the prevention of coronary heart disease: multiple potential mechanisms. J Nutr. 2008;138(9):1746S‐1751S. doi:10.1093/jn/138.9.1746S
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
