Barriers to Family Planning Service Utilization in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study

Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 Oct;33(Spec Iss 2):143-154. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i2.8S.

Abstract

Background: The unmet need for family planning (FP) is a major impediment to achieving the sustainable development goal The COVID-19 pandemic and other contextual, individual, and hospital-related problems are major barriers that reduce FP service uptake. However, most of the studies are quantitative and give due focus to individual and community-level barriers. Therefore, this study tends to explore barriers to the utilization of FP in Ethiopia including health care and contextual barriers.

Methods: A multiple explorative case study design was employed from October to December 2021 and a total of 41 Key-informant interviews, 32 in-depth interviews, and 13 focus group discussions were performed by using the purposive sampling technique. The data were analyzed with a thematic content analysis approach using NVivo software.

Result: This study explored barriers to FP in four major teams; individual, community-related, health system, and contextual barriers. It reviled that the community's misconception, fear of side effects, lack of women's decision-making autonomy, existing socio-cultural norms, religious conditions, topography, covid 19 pandemic, and conflict were the major barriers to FP service utilization.

Conclusion: Using the four teams mentioned above, this study identified different poor health professional skills, misconceptions, pandemics, functional, and structurally related barriers. As a result, it is recommended that health education for the community and training for health professionals are important. Collaboration between government and non-government organizations is also mandatory for strengthening mentorship and supervision systems and establishing resilient health care that can avoid future pandemics.

Keywords: Barriers; Ethiopia; Family Planning; Misconception.

MeSH terms

  • Ethiopia
  • Family Planning Services* / methods
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Pandemics*
  • Qualitative Research