Limitation of life sustaining therapy in disorders of consciousness: ethics and practice

Abstract

Clinical conversations surrounding the continuation or limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LLST) are both challenging and tragically necessary for patients with Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) following severe brain injury. Divergent cultural, philosophical, and religious perspectives contribute to vast heterogeneity in clinical approaches to LLST - as reflected in regional differences and inter-clinician variability. Here we provide an ethical analysis of factors that inform LLST decisions among patients with DoC. We begin by introducing the clinical and ethical challenge and clarifying the distinction between withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining therapy. We then describe relevant factors that influence LLST decision-making including diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty, perception of pain, defining a "good" outcome, and the role of clinicians. In concluding sections, we explore global variation in LLST practices as they pertain to patients with DoC and examine the impact of religious perspectives on approaches to LLST. Understanding and respecting the cultural and religious perspectives of patients and surrogates is essential for protecting patient autonomy and advancing goal-concordant care during critical moments of medical decision making.

Keywords: brain injury; covert consciousness/cognitive-motor dissociation; disorders of consciousness; minimally conscious state; neuroethics; unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state.