Objective: To investigate if wearing surgical face mask by doctors and nurses during suturing of traumatic wounds has any impact on postoperative infection rate.
Design: Randomized controlled study with masked or unmasked health personnel groups.
Setting: A Norwegian Minor Injury Department.
Subjects: Adult patients with traumatic wounds sutured at the clinic between 7 October 2019 and 28 May 2020.
Main outcome measures: Postoperative infections of sutured wounds.
Results: One hundred and sixty-five patients with 176 wounds were included in the study. Nine out of 88 wounds (10.2%) in the masked group and 11 out of 88 wounds in the unmasked group (12.5%) had a wound infection.
Conclusions: Despite a higher percentage of postoperative infections in the unmasked than in the masked group (12.5% versus 10.2%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = .6). This might imply that the use of facemasks during suture of traumatic wounds in an outpatient setting does not significantly reduce the number of infections. However, due to the covid pandemic, the study had to be prematurely stopped before the planned number of participants had been recruited (n = 594). This increases the risk of type II error.
Keywords: Facemask; accident and emergency department; minor injury department; primary health care; traumatic laceration; wound infection; wound sutures.
Few studies from hospital setting have found significant difference in postoperative wound infections if surgical face masks were worn or not during surgery.High quality studies about face masks and wound infections from primary care are lacking.This randomized study at a minor injury department outside hospital found no significant difference in frequency of postoperative wound infection if health personnel had worn surgical face masks or not while suturing traumatic wounds.