Refining a Framework to Enhance Communication in the Emergency Department During the Diagnostic Process: An eDelphi Approach
- PMID: 38423950
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.013
Refining a Framework to Enhance Communication in the Emergency Department During the Diagnostic Process: An eDelphi Approach
Abstract
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) are susceptible to diagnostic error. Suboptimal communication between the patient and the interdisciplinary care team increases risk to diagnostic safety. The role of communication remains underrepresented in existing diagnostic decision-making conceptual models.
Methods: The authors used eDelphi methodology, whereby data are collected electronically, to achieve consensus among an expert panel of 18 clinicians, patients, family members, and other participants on a refined ED-based diagnostic decision-making framework that integrates several potential opportunities for communication to enhance diagnostic quality. This study examined the entire diagnostic process in the ED, from prehospital to discharge or transfer to inpatient care, and identified where communication breakdowns could occur. After four iterative rounds of the eDelphi process, including a final validation round by all participants, the project's a priori consensus threshold of 80% agreement was reached.
Results: The authors developed a final framework that positions communication more prominently in the diagnostic process in the ED and enhances the original National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) and ED-adapted NASEM frameworks. Specific points in the ED journey were identified where more attention to communication might be helpful. Two specific types of communication-information exchange and shared understanding-were identified as high priority for optimal outcomes. Ideas for communication-focused interventions to prevent diagnostic error in the ED fell into three categories: patient-facing, clinician-facing, and system-facing interventions.
Conclusion: This project's refinement of the NASEM framework adapted to the ED can be used to develop communications-focused interventions to reduce diagnostic error in this highly complex and error-prone setting.
Copyright © 2024 The Joint Commission. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Jul;50(7):480-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 38643047 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding diagnostic processes in emergency departments: a mixed methods case study protocol.BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 24;11(9):e044194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044194. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34561251 Free PMC article.
-
An Operational Framework to Study Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments: Findings From A Consensus Panel.J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):570-575. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000624. J Patient Saf. 2021. PMID: 31790012
-
Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care.J Patient Saf. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):770-778. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000999. Epub 2022 Apr 27. J Patient Saf. 2022. PMID: 35405723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors.Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Nov 13;8(3):340-346. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0122. Print 2021 Aug 26. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020. PMID: 33180032 Review.
Cited by
-
Addressing diagnostic uncertainty and excellence in emergency care-from multicountry policy analysis to communication practice in Australian emergency departments: a multimethod study protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 13;14(9):e085335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085335. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39277199 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
