Prevalence of errors causing events allegedly attributable to vaccination/immunization: systematic review and meta-analysis

Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2024 Mar 11:45:e20230097. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230097.en. eCollection 2024.
[Article in English, Portuguese]

Abstract

Objective: To identify the prevalence of errors that caused events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization.

Method: Systematic literature review with meta-analysis carried out on the Medline, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Web of Science, Lilacs, Scopus; Embase; Open Grey; Google Scholar; and Grey Lit databases; with studies that presented the prevalence of immunization errors that caused events or that provided data that allowed this indicator to be calculated.

Results: We evaluated 11 articles published between 2010 and 2021, indicating a prevalence of 0.044 errors per 10,000 doses administered (n=762; CI95%: 0.026 - 0.075; I2 = 99%, p < 0.01). The prevalence was higher in children under 5 (0.334 / 10,000 doses; n=14). The predominant events were fever, local pain, edema and redness.

Conclusion: A low prevalence of errors causing events was identified. However, events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and, consequently, have an impact on vaccination coverage.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Databases, Factual
  • Fever
  • Humans
  • Immunization*
  • Prevalence
  • Vaccination*