Background: Delay discounting is the depreciation in a reward's perceived value as a function of the time until receipt. Monetary incentive programs that provide rewards contingent on meeting daily physical activity (PA) goals may change participants' delay discounting preferences.
Purpose: Determine if monetary incentives provided in close temporal proximity to meeting PA goals changed delay discounting, and if such changes mediated intervention effects.
Methods: Inactive adults (n = 512) wore accelerometers during a 12-month intervention where they received proximal monetary incentives for meeting daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) goals or delayed incentives for study participation. Delay discount rate and average MVPA were assessed at baseline, end of intervention, and a 24-month follow-up. Using structural equation modeling, we tested effects of proximal versus delayed rewards on delay discounting and whether any changes mediated intervention effects on MVPA. PA self-efficacy was also evaluated as a potential mediator, and both self-efficacy and delay discounting were assessed as potential moderators of intervention effects.
Results: Proximal rewards significantly increased participants' delay discounting (β = 0.238, confidence interval [CI]: -0.078, 0.380), indicating greater sensitivity to reinforcement timing. This change did not mediate incentive-associated increases in MVPA at the end of the 12-month intervention (β = -0.016, CI: -0.053, 0.019) or at a 24-month follow-up (β = -0.020, CI: -0.059, 0.018). Moderation effects were not found.
Conclusions: Incentive-induced increases in delay discounting did not deleteriously impact MVPA. This finding may help assuage concerns about using monetary incentives for PA promotion, but further research regarding the consequences of changes in delay discounting is warranted.
Keywords: Contingency management; Delay discounting; Mediation; Physical activity.
This study examined the effects of providing proximal monetary incentives for meeting daily exercise goals on people’s tendency to value immediate versus delayed rewards. Inactive adults (n = 512) participated in a year-long program where they wore an accelerometer each day and received either (i) small monetary rewards in close temporal proximity to instances of meeting daily exercise goals or (ii) larger rewards at 2-month intervals for ongoing participation. Those receiving proximal incentives showed an increased preference for immediate rewards, yet this reported change did not compromise long-term physical activity gains. In a comparison analysis, we found that proximal monetary incentives were not associated with changes in exercise self-efficacy. Overall, the findings suggest that monetary incentives for exercise do not negatively impact people’s activity levels, though more research is needed to fully understand the implications of changes in reward timing preferences.
© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.