Office or home versus 24-hour blood pressure measurement in stable kidney transplant recipients

Georgios Eleftheriadis; Marcel G Naik; Bilgin Osmanodja; Fabian Halleck; Eva Schrezenmeier; Lutz Liefeldt; Mira Choi; Friederike Bachmann; Despina Parthenopi Avaniadi; Ellen von Hoerschelmann; Christian Lücht; Marina Zaks; Wiebke Duettmann; Klemens Budde

doi:10.1093/ndt/gfae076

Office or home versus 24-hour blood pressure measurement in stable kidney transplant recipients

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Mar 28:gfae076. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae076. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
² Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.

PMID: 38549427
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfae076

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: The aim of this study was to quantify hypertension control and evaluate concordance between all commonly available blood pressure modalities in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

Methods: For this prospective cross-sectional study 89 stable KTR were recruited at the Charité Transplant Outpatient Clinic. For each study participant office (manual office blood pressure 'MOBP' and automated office blood pressure 'AOBP'), 7-day home (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (24h-ABPM) were performed.

Results: 80 of the 89 patients recruited had sufficient blood pressure recordings. Mean blood pressure for MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and 24h-ABPM was 129/73, 126/71, 131/85 and 130/81 mmHg, respectively. Uncontrolled hypertension, as defined by 24h-ABPM (mean ≥ 130/80 mmHg), was present in 53 (66%) patients. MOBP, AOBP and HBPM classified 19 (24%), 22 (28%) and 41 (51%) patients respectively as 'uncontrolled hypertensive'. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between systolic MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and Daytime-ABPM (mean bias ± SD: -1 ± 13 mmHg, -4 ± 13 mmHg, 1 ± 10 mmHg, respectively). Uncontrolled nighttime hypertension was present in 74 (93%) KTR, with 71 (89%) patients showing a non-physiological dipping pattern. Moderate positive correlation between Daytime-ABPM/HBPM and Nighttime-ABPM (Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.62-0.73), followed by MOBP/AOBP (Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.49-0.59) was noted. eGFR and proteinuria displayed weak correlation with 24h-, Daytime- and Nighttime-ABPM (absolute values of Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.04-0.41). No robust association with either 24h-, Daytime- or Nighttime-ABPM was observed for volume status exams.

Conclusions: Masked hypertension is highly prevalent in KTR, especially due to high rates of uncontrolled nighttime hypertension. HBPM shows the narrowest limits of agreement with Daytime-ABPM. Daytime-ABPM and HBPM show the highest, albeit clinically insufficient, correlation with Nighttime-ABPM. Systematic integration of 24h-ABPM into clinical practice, as proposed by the '2023 ESH Guidelines for the Management of arterial hypertension', should not be withheld for the KTR population. Clinical trials evaluating treatment of hypertension in KTR are urgently needed.

Keywords: Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM); Automated office blood pressure (AOBP); Home blood pressure measurement (HBPM); Kidney transplantation; Manual office blood pressure (MOBP).