Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;19(6):505-507.
doi: 10.1002/jhm.13351. Epub 2024 Apr 1.

Development of a hospital coding intensity measure based on sepsis diagnoses

Affiliations

Development of a hospital coding intensity measure based on sepsis diagnoses

Michael I Ellenbogen et al. J Hosp Med. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Significant variation in coding intensity among hospitals has been observed and can lead to reimbursement inequities and inadequate risk adjustment for quality measures. Reliable tools to quantify hospital coding intensity are needed. We hypothesized that coded sepsis rates among patients hospitalized with common infections may serve as a useful surrogate for coding intensity and derived a hospital-level sepsis coding intensity measure using prevalence of "sepsis" primary diagnoses among patients hospitalized with urinary tract infection, cellulitis, and pneumonia. This novel measure was well correlated with the hospital mean number of discharge diagnoses, which has historically been used to quantify hospital-level coding intensity. However, it has the advantage of inferring hospital coding intensity without the strong association with comorbidity that the mean number of discharge diagnoses has. Our measure may serve as a useful tool to compare coding intensity across institutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Dragan KL, Desai SM, Billings J, Glied SA. Association of insurance mix and diagnostic coding practices in New York State hospitals. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(9):e222919. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2919
    1. Goldman LE, Chu PW, Osmond D, Bindman A. The accuracy of present‐on‐admission reporting in administrative data. Health Serv Res. 2011;46(6 pt 1):1946‐1962. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01300.x
    1. Kosar CM, Loomer L, Thomas KS, White EM, Panagiotou OA, Rahman M. Association of diagnosis coding with differences in risk‐adjusted short‐term mortality between critical access and non‐critical access hospitals. JAMA. 2020;324(5):481. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.9935
    1. Rubens M, Saxena A, Ramamoorthy V, et al. Increasing sepsis rates in the United States: results from national inpatient sample, 2005 to 2014. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35(9):858‐868. doi:10.1177/0885066618794136
    1. Lindenauer PK, Lagu T, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Rothberg MB. Association of diagnostic coding with trends in hospitalizations and mortality of patients with pneumonia, 2003‐2009. JAMA. 2012;307(13):1405‐1413. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.384

LinkOut - more resources