How do enrollees feel about support in Big Hospices? - The caregiver experience of emotional, spiritual, and bereavement support by profit status among large US providers
- PMID: 38587043
- DOI: 10.1017/S1478951524000506
How do enrollees feel about support in Big Hospices? - The caregiver experience of emotional, spiritual, and bereavement support by profit status among large US providers
Abstract
Objectives: Recent findings narrate profiteering detrimentally impacting hospice care quality. However, no study has examined the caregiver experience of emotional and spiritual support expressed online. The purpose was to evaluate the hospice caregiver's experience of emotional, spiritual, and bereavement support and whether the care was respectful and compassionate to the care unit.
Methods: Retrospective mixed methods of sentiment and quantitative analysis. Sources were online caregiver reviews (n = 4,279), Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) data on the 50 largest US hospices.
Results: Caring and compassionate professionals were lauded in nonprofit (+.57) and for-profit settings (+.46). The nonprofit experience was in the excellent range (+42) for emotional, spiritual, and bereavement support but fell to dissatisfying (-.15) among for-profits. A respectful experience (16%) was much less commonly expressed than a compassionate one (38%). Distribution of CAHPS "Treating patient with respect" (M = 89.62, SD = 2.63) and "Emotional and spiritual support" (M = 89.80, SD = 2.04) limited inter-hospice comparisons.
Significance of results: Compassionate professionals were thanked and praised regardless of profit status. Sadly, anger was expressed toward large, for-profits more fixated on census than emotional, spiritual, and bereavement support; thankfully nonprofits were more supportive. CAHPS items for "Treating patient with respect" and "Emotional, spiritual support" offer limited discriminating value since low CAHPS performers always had relatively high scores on these 2, yet otherwise low scores on the remaining 6. Online reviews on the same topics provide a more substantive and realistic appraisal - distinguishing high from low performers. A higher bar than mere respect is needed for the tender experience of death, dying, and grieving. Compassion is an especially relevant addition to CAHPS since caregivers named compassionate staff as a distinguishing factor. Parity for mental health at end of life is a vital research topic. Future research should also explore the caregiver expectations set on admission.
Keywords: Big Hospice; CAHPS® scores; Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems; caregiver experience; emotional support; profit status; spiritual support.
Similar articles
-
Caregiver and Employee Experience Among Big Hospices-Ranking of the Largest US Hospices by Three Quality Indicators.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Sep;41(9):987-1001. doi: 10.1177/10499091231206481. Epub 2023 Oct 17. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024. PMID: 37848330
-
Development of a model and method for hospice quality assessment from natural language processing (NLP) analysis of online caregiver reviews.Palliat Support Care. 2024 Feb;22(1):19-30. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523001001. Palliat Support Care. 2024. PMID: 37443425
-
Overall US Hospice Quality According to Decedent Caregivers-Natural Language Processing and Sentiment Analysis of 3389 Online Caregiver Reviews.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 May;41(5):527-544. doi: 10.1177/10499091231185593. Epub 2023 Jun 20. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024. PMID: 37338245
-
Cancer family caregivers during the palliative, hospice, and bereavement phases: a review of the descriptive psychosocial literature.Palliat Support Care. 2011 Sep;9(3):315-25. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000265. Palliat Support Care. 2011. PMID: 21838952 Review.
-
When does the responsibility of our care end: bereavement.Oncologist. 2002;7(3):251-8. Oncologist. 2002. PMID: 12065799 Review.
Cited by
-
Latent profile analysis of empathy ability and its relationship with professional quality of life among hospice nurses in China.BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 16;23(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02299-9. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39285294 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
