Characterizing nursing time with patients using computer vision
- PMID: 38615340
- DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12971
Characterizing nursing time with patients using computer vision
Abstract
Background: Compared to other providers, nurses spend more time with patients, but the exact quantity and nature of those interactions remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to characterize the interactions of nurses at the bedside using continuous surveillance over a year long period.
Methods: Nurses' time and activity at the bedside were characterized using a device that integrates the use of obfuscated computer vision in combination with a Bluetooth beacon on the nurses' identification badge to track nurses' activities at the bedside. The surveillance device (AUGi) was installed over 37 patient beds in two medical/surgical units in a major urban hospital. Forty-nine nurse users were tracked using the beacon. Data were collected 4/15/19-3/15/20. Statistics were performed to describe nurses' time and activity at the bedside.
Results: A total of n = 408,588 interactions were analyzed over 670 shifts, with >1.5 times more interactions during day shifts (n = 247,273) compared to night shifts (n = 161,315); the mean interaction time was 3.34 s longer during nights than days (p < 0.0001). Each nurse had an average of 7.86 (standard deviation [SD] = 10.13) interactions per bed each shift and a mean total interaction time per bed of 9.39 min (SD = 14.16). On average, nurses covered 7.43 beds (SD = 4.03) per shift (day: mean = 7.80 beds/nurse/shift, SD = 3.87; night: mean = 7.07/nurse/shift, SD = 4.17). The mean time per hourly rounding (HR) was 69.5 s (SD = 98.07) and 50.1 s (SD = 56.58) for bedside shift report.
Discussion: As far as we are aware, this is the first study to provide continuous surveillance of nurse activities at the bedside over a year long period, 24 h/day, 7 days/week. We detected that nurses spend less than 1 min giving report at the bedside, and this is only completed 20.7% of the time. Additionally, hourly rounding was completed only 52.9% of the time and nurses spent only 9 min total with each patient per shift. Further study is needed to detect whether there is an optimal timing or duration of interactions to improve patient outcomes.
Clinical relevance: Nursing time with the patient has been shown to improve patient outcomes but precise information about how much time nurses spend with patients has been heretofore unknown. By understanding minute-by-minute activities at the bedside over a full year, we provide a full picture of nursing activity; this can be used in the future to determine how these activities affect patient outcomes.
Keywords: biometry; computer vision; computers; decision support; hospital; medical‐surgical nursing; nursing staff; patients; technology.
© 2024 Sigma Theta Tau International.
Similar articles
-
Technology Assessment: Early Sense for Monitoring Vital Signs in Hospitalized Patients [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2016 May. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2016 May. PMID: 27606394 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Mapping nurses' activities in surgical hospital wards: A time study.PLoS One. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0191807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191807. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29689048 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Nurses' Perception of Patient Rounding Scale: An Exploratory Study of the Influence of Shift Work on Nurses' Perception of Patient Rounding.Orthop Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;35(2):84-91. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000223. Orthop Nurs. 2016. PMID: 27028683
-
Unit-related factors that affect nursing time with patients: spatial analysis of the time and motion study.HERD. 2009 Winter;2(2):5-20. doi: 10.1177/193758670900200202. HERD. 2009. PMID: 21161927
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abobakr, A., Hossny, M., & Nahavandi, S. (2017). A skeleton‐free fall detection system from depth images using random decision forest. IEEE Systems Journal, 12(3), 2994–3005.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Quality (AHRQ) Nurse BSR implementation handbook. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/h...
-
- Butler, R., Monsalve, M., Thomas, G. W., Herman, T., Segre, A. M., Polgreen, P. M., & Suneja, M. (2018). Estimating time physicians and other health care workers spend with patients in an intensive care unit using a sensor network. The American Journal of Medicine, 131(8), 972.e9–972.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.03.015
-
- Demiris, G., Hensel, B. K., Skubic, M., & Rantz, M. (2008). Senior residents' perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24(1), 120–124.
-
- Driscoll, A., Grant, M. J., Carroll, D., Dalton, S., Deaton, C., Jones, I., Lehwaldt, D., McKee, G., Munyombwe, T., & Astin, F. (2018). The effect of nurse‐to‐patient ratios on nurse‐sensitive patient outcomes in acute specialist units: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17(1), 6–22.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
