Background & aims: Despite previously reported treatment strategies for nonfunctioning small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), uncertainties persist. We aimed to evaluate the surgically resected cases nonfunctioning small pNENs (NF-spNENs) in a large Japanese cohort to elucidate an optimal treatment strategy for NF-spNENs.
Methods: In this Japanese multicenter study, data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 1996 and December 2019, were pathologically diagnosed with pNEN, and were treated according to the WHO 2019 classification. Overall, 1,490 patients met the eligibility criteria, and 1,014 were included in the analysis cohort.
Results: In the analysis cohort, 606 patients (59.8%) had NF-spNENs, with 82% classified as grade 1 (NET-G1) and 18% as grade 2 (NET-G2) or higher. The incidence of lymph node metastasis (N1) by grade was significantly higher in NET-G2 (G1: 3.1% vs. G2: 15.0%). Independent factors contributing to N1 were NET-G2 or higher and tumor diameter ≥15 mm. The predictive ability of tumor size for N1 was high. Independent factors contributing to recurrence included multiple lesions, NET-G2 or higher, tumor diameter ≥15 mm, and N1. However, the independent factor contributing to survival was tumor grade (NET-G2 or higher). The appropriate timing for surgical resection of NET-G1 and NET-G2 or higher was when tumors were >20 and >10 mm, respectively. For neoplasms with unknown preoperative grades, tumor size >15 mm was considered appropriate.
Conclusions: NF-spNENs are heterogeneous with varying levels of malignancy. Therefore, treatment strategies based on tumor size alone can be unreliable; personalized treatment strategies that consider tumor grading are preferable.
Keywords: Japanese cohort; grading; neuroendocrine tumor; tumor size.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.