Patterns of interactions among ICU interprofessional teams: A prospective patient-shift-level survey approach
- PMID: 38625976
- PMCID: PMC11020828
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298586
Patterns of interactions among ICU interprofessional teams: A prospective patient-shift-level survey approach
Abstract
Background: The Awakening, Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring and Early mobility bundle (ABCDE) is associated with lower mortality for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, efforts to improve ABCDE are variably successful, possibly due to lack of clarity about who are the team members interacting when caring for each patient, each shift. Lack of patient shift-level information regarding who is interacting with whom limits the ability to tailor interventions to the specific ICU team to improve ABCDE.
Objective: Determine the number and types of individuals (i.e., clinicians and family members) interacting in the care of mechanically ventilated (MV) patients, as reported by the patients' assigned physician, nurse, and respiratory therapist (RT) each shift, using a network science lens.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, patient-shift-level survey in 2 medical ICUs. For each patient, we surveyed the assigned physician, nurse, and RT each day and night shift about who they interacted with when providing ABCDE for each patient-shift. We determined the number and types of interactions, reported by physicians, nurses, and RTs and day versus night shift.
Results: From 1558 surveys from 404 clinicians who cared for 169 patients over 166 shifts (65% response rate), clinicians reported interacting with 2.6 individuals each shift (physicians: 2.65, nurses: 3.33, RTs: 1.86); this was fewer on night shift compared to day shift (1.99 versus 3.02). Most frequent interactions were with the bedside nurse, attending, resident, intern, and RT; family member interactions were reported in less than 1 in 5 surveys (12.2% of physician surveys, 19.7% of nurse surveys, 4.9% of RT surveys).
Interpretation: Clinicians reported interacting with 3-4 clinicians each shift, and fewer on nights. Nurses interacted with the most clincians and family members. Interventions targeting shift-level teams, focusing on nurses and family members, may be a way to improve ABCDE delivery and ICU teamwork.
Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Implementing the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle into everyday care: opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned for implementing the ICU Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines.Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S116-27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a17064. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23989089 Free PMC article.
-
Ability to predict team members' behaviors in ICU teams is associated with routine ABCDE implementation.J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 Mar 1. J Crit Care. 2019. PMID: 30856524 Free PMC article.
-
ICU team composition and its association with ABCDE implementation in a quality collaborative.J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.180. Epub 2017 Sep 28. J Crit Care. 2018. PMID: 28978488 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Barriers to Delivering the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium, and Early Exercise/Mobility Bundle to Minimize Adverse Outcomes for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review.Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):304-311. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.03.054. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Chest. 2017. PMID: 28438605 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
References
-
- Balas MC, Vasilevskis EE, Olsen KM, Schmid KK, Shostrom V, Cohen MZ, et al.. Effectiveness and safety of the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle. Critical care medicine. 2014. May;42(5):1024–36. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Devlin JW, Gélinas C, Dale;, Needham M, Arjen;, Slooter JC, et al.. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Critical Care Medicine. 2018;46(9):e825–873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, Thomason JW, Schweickert WD, Pun BT, et al.. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2008;371(9607):126–34. - PubMed
-
- Braun A, Garner O, Staggers K, Velamuri K. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sedation practices and the ABCDEF bundle compliance: A national survey of intensivists in the United States. Chest. 2022. Jun;161(6):A201.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
