The usage of population and disease registries as pre-screening tools for clinical trials, a systematic review

Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 23;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02533-0.

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aims to outline the use of population and disease registries for clinical trial pre-screening.

Materials and methods: The search was conducted in the time period of January 2014 to December 2022 in three databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection. References were screened using the Rayyan software, firstly based on titles and abstracts only, and secondly through full text review. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the List of Included Studies and quality Assurance in Review tool, enabling inclusion of publications of only moderate to high quality.

Results: The search originally identified 1430 citations, but only 24 studies were included, reporting the use of population and/or disease registries for trial pre-screening. Nine disease domains were represented, with 54% of studies using registries based in the USA, and 62.5% of the studies using national registries. Half of the studies reported usage for drug trials, and over 478,679 patients were identified through registries in this review. Main advantages of the pre-screening methodology were reduced financial burden and time reduction.

Discussion and conclusion: The use of registries for trial pre-screening increases reproducibility of the pre-screening process across trials and sites, allowing for implementation and improvement of a quality assurance process. Pre-screening strategies seem under-reported, and we encourage more trials to use and describe their pre-screening processes, as there is a need for standardized methodological guidelines.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Patient selection; Pre-screening; Registry; Review.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Trials as Topic*
  • Humans
  • Patient Selection
  • Registries*
  • Reproducibility of Results