Hospital Unit Type and Professional Roles as a Predictor of Relational Coordination in an Army Medical Center

Sherita House; Hebatallah A Naim Ali; Christopher Stucky

doi:10.1097/QMH.0000000000000444

Hospital Unit Type and Professional Roles as a Predictor of Relational Coordination in an Army Medical Center

Qual Manag Health Care. 2024 Apr 24. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000444. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Sherita House¹, Hebatallah A Naim Ali, Christopher Stucky

Affiliation

¹ Author Affiliations:University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Nursing (Dr House); The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Dr Naim Ali); and Center for Nursing Science and Clinical Inquiry (CNSCI), Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, AE, Germany (Dr Stucky).

PMID: 38654420
DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000444

Abstract

Background and objectives: High-quality communication and relationships are associated with quality of care. Workflow differences across hospital units can impede communication and relationships among health care professionals. Relational coordination (RC) is a process of communication supported by shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect and is associated with quality of care and better performance outcomes in civilian hospitals. However, RC has not been explored in military hospitals. The objective of our study was to determine whether RC differs between hospital units and professional roles. Specifically, we examined RC differences by unit type for nurses, resident physicians, and physicians working in an Army Medical Center.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory analysis of a secondary question from a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of active-duty and civilian licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), physician residents, and physicians (n = 289). We received institutional review board approval from the study site. Data were collected from January 2020 to March 2020, and participants completed a 47-item survey regarding their experiences of RC in various hospital units. We used t tests and one-way analyses of variance to explore bivariate relationships between RC and other study variables, as well as multiple regression to explore whether RC varied by unit type. We controlled for education and experience by including them in the model because these variables may influence perceptions of nurse-physician RC and their interactions with each other.

Results: Seventy percent of participants were civilian (n = 203), 75% RNs (n = 217), and 78% female (n = 216). The mean age of respondents was 40 years (SD = 11.7), and the mean experience level was 11.9 years (SD = 9.5). RC was not associated with unit type. Total RC and between-role RC were associated with professional role. Physicians reported higher RC (β = .45, P = .01), and LPNs reported lower RC (β = -.06, P = .01). Education and experience were associated with RC. Participants with less experience reported higher RC (β = -.01, P = .00), and participants with graduate degrees reported lower RC (β = -.62, P = .00).

Conclusions: We recommend hospital leaders consider interventions to build interprofessional relationships, including interdisciplinary meetings, huddles, and structured communication tools. Improving RC among health care professionals is a cost-effective and unique way to enhance communication and collaboration among health care professionals across hospital units.