Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Combined Segmental Thoracic Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Abdominal Surgeries and Laparoscopic Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

Alaa Ali M Elzohry; Ahmed S Hegab; Osama Yehia A Khalifa; Khadeja M Elhossieny; Fatma Al Zahraa H Abdel Hameed

doi:10.5812/aapm-138825

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Combined Segmental Thoracic Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Abdominal Surgeries and Laparoscopic Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 14;13(6):e138825. doi: 10.5812/aapm-138825. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Authors

Alaa Ali M Elzohry¹, Ahmed S Hegab², Osama Yehia A Khalifa², Khadeja M Elhossieny², Fatma Al Zahraa H Abdel Hameed¹

Affiliations

¹ Anasthesia, ICU and Pain Management, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, El Fateh, Egypt.
² Anasthesiology, ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Abstract

Background: Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia (SA) may be a good alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures, especially in high-risk patients.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of thoracic segmental SA vs GA during abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures.

Methods: This study was conducted at our university hospital and involved a total of 46 patients who underwent abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures. The study period spanned from January 15, 2022, to October 15, 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 23) received standard GA, and group 2 (n = 23) received thoracic segmental SA. A combination of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 25 μg of fentanyl was injected through the spinal needle. The epidural catheter was then threaded through the Tuohy needle after withdrawal of the spinal needle to keep only 4 cm up in the epidural space. Demographic data, both intra and postoperative hemodynamic parameters, were monitored. Postoperatively, pain in both groups was treated with intravenous (IV) morphine by patient controlled analgesia (PCA), PCA settings were 1 mg morphine/mL, no background infusion, bolus dose 2 mL and lockout interval 15 min. Postoperative, both resting VAS and VAS during cough were measured for all patients at fixed intervals, and all patients were followed up for postoperative complications.

Results: No significant variation was found in demographic data. Intra and postoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) measurements were higher in group 1 than in group 2 but without a statistically significant difference (P < 0.029). Early postoperative VAS values and discharge time from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were significantly reduced in group 2 than in group 1 (P < 0.001). The number of patients asked for analgesia and total opioid consumption were substantially reduced in group 2 than in group 1. Also, the time of the first analgesia request and patient satisfaction were substantially greater in group 2 than in group 1.

Conclusions: Combined thoracic spinal/epidural block results in stable hemodynamics, longer postoperative analgesia with fewer side effects, and greater surgeon and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures.

Keywords: Acute Pain; Combined Thoracic Spinal Epidural; General Anesthesia; Laparoscopic Surgeries; VAS Scores.