Background: The treatment of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) is conducted according to well-defined risk stratification systems. We hypothesized that adherence to the guidelines, namely the decision to refrain from introducing cytoreduction in non-high-risk patients, is particularly difficult in patients diagnosed when they are between 40 and 59 years of age (intermediate-age group).
Objectives: To evaluate the group of intermediate-age PV and ET patients, focusing on a first-line treatment approach adapted at diagnosis.
Material and methods: The study group consisted of 308 PV and ET patients recruited from 6 Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) Centers. Patients were analyzed with respect to disease phenotype, risk group, treatment approach, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, and occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis.
Results: Overall, 74% of patients in the study group were started on cytoreduction at diagnosis, including 70% of the low-risk PV patients and 85-89% of the non-high-risk ET patients. Factors influencing the decision to start the treatment included higher hemoglobin (Hb) concentration (in PV) as well as higher platelet (PLT) count, and the presence of CV risk factors (in ET). Introducing cytoreduction at diagnosis had no impact on thrombotic events. Patients harboring CV risk factors experienced a higher incidence of complications both at diagnosis and follow-up, independently of the treatment strategy.
Conclusions: We underline the low adherence to recommendations in the treatment of intermediate-age PV and ET patients. Moreover, we emphasize the importance of CV risk factors and stress their impact on disease phenotype in this patient population.
Keywords: cardiovascular risk; cytoreduction; essential thrombocythemia; polycythemia vera.