Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: Effect of Procedural Variant on Patients With a Prolonged Preoperative Duration of Symptoms From Disk Herniation

Timothy J Hartman; James W Nie; Ishan Khosla; Omolabake O Oyetayo; Keith R MacGregor; Eileen Zheng; Fatima N Anwar; Andrea M Roca; Alexandra C Loya; Srinath S Medakkar; Vincent P Federico; Dustin H Massel; Arash J Sayari; Gregory D Lopez; Kern Singh

doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00655

Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: Effect of Procedural Variant on Patients With a Prolonged Preoperative Duration of Symptoms From Disk Herniation

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr 30. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00655. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Timothy J Hartman¹, James W Nie, Ishan Khosla, Omolabake O Oyetayo, Keith R MacGregor, Eileen Zheng, Fatima N Anwar, Andrea M Roca, Alexandra C Loya, Srinath S Medakkar, Vincent P Federico, Dustin H Massel, Arash J Sayari, Gregory D Lopez, Kern Singh

Affiliation

¹ From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

PMID: 38696821
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00655

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with a prolonged preoperative symptom duration (PSD) in the setting of cervical disk herniation (DH) may suffer inferior outcomes after surgical intervention. Comparison between anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) in this at-risk population has not yet been conducted.

Methods: Patients undergoing ACDF or CDA for DH with a PSD > 180 days were selected. Six-week (6W) and final follow-up (FF) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as well as magnitude of postoperative improvements (∆PROM) were compared between cohorts using multivariable linear regression. Intercohort achievement rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in each PROM were compared.

Results: Seventy-seven of 190 patients were in the CDA cohort. 6W Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) was superior in the CDA cohort. The ACDF cohort demonstrated notable improvements in the 6W Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale-neck pain (VAS-N), visual analog scale-arm pain (VAS-A), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The CDA cohort demonstrated notable improvements in 6W PROMIS-PF, NDI, VAS-N, and VAS-A. FF VAS-A was better in the CDA cohort. The ACDF cohort demonstrated notable improvements in FF PROMIS-PF, NDI, VAS-N, and VAS-A. The CDA cohort demonstrated notable improvements in all FF PROMs. ∆PROM-6W in PROMIS-PF was greater in the CDA cohort.

Conclusion: Patients with prolonged PSD due to cervical DH demonstrated notable improvements in physical function, disability, pain, and mental health regardless of fusion versus arthroplasty techniques. Accounting for demographic variations, patients undergoing CDA demonstrated a greater magnitude of improvement and superior scores in physical function at the first postoperative follow-up. Rates of clinically tangible improvements in PROMs did not markedly vary by surgical procedure. Patients undergoing CDA may perceive greater early improvements to physical function compared with patients undergoing ACDF for prolonged PSD due to DH.