Does open or closed reduction with internal fixation reduces the incidence of complications in neck of femur fractures in pediatrics: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Ahmed T Hafez; Mohammed Aly; Islam Omar; George Richardson; Kyle James

doi:10.1097/BPB.0000000000001186

Does open or closed reduction with internal fixation reduces the incidence of complications in neck of femur fractures in pediatrics: a meta-analysis and systematic review

J Pediatr Orthop B. 2024 May 3. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001186. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Ahmed T Hafez^{1

2}, Mohammed Aly^{1

2}, Islam Omar³, George Richardson¹, Kyle James^{2

4}

Affiliations

¹ University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
² The Blizard Institute Centre for Trauma Sciences, Queen Mary University of London Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London.
³ Antrim Area Hospital, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim.
⁴ University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.

PMID: 38700872
DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001186

Abstract

The neck of femur fracture (FNF) in children is a rare injury with a high incidence of complications such as avascular necrosis (AVN), coxa-vara and nonunion. The aim of this review is to compare the incidence of complications between open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction with internal fixation (CRIF) of FNF in children. Two independent reviewers searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, COCHRANE and PUBMED databases from inception until April 2022 according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Studies included comparison of complications between open and closed approaches with fixation of FNF in patients less than 18 years old. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test while the Newcastle-Ottawa tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A total of 724 hip fractures from 15 included studies received either ORIF or CRIF. Overall, the rate of AVN was approximately 21.7% without statistical significance between both reduction methods [relative risk (RR) = 0.909, using fixed effect model at 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.678-1.217)]. No significant heterogeneity among AVN studies ( I2 = 3.79%, P = 0.409). Similarly, neither coxa-vara nor nonunion rates were statistically significant in both treatment groups (RR = 0.693 and RR = 0.506, respectively). Coxa-vara studies showed mild heterogeneity ( I2 = 27.8%, P = 0.218), while significant publication bias was encountered in nonunion studies ( P = 0.048). No significant difference in the incidence of AVN, coxa-vara and nonunion between ORIF or CRIF of FNF in children. High-quality studies as Randomised Controlled Trials can resolve the inconsistency and heterogeneity of other risk factors including age, initial displacement, fracture type, reduction quality and time to fixation.