Efficacy and safety of catheter-based thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism

Am Heart J. 2024 Jun:272:109-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

Abstract

Data comparing catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in acute pulmonary embolism are lacking. To address this, we performed a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies of CBT and compared it to performance goal rates of mortality and major bleeding from a recently published network meta-analysis. When compared with performance goal for CDT based on historical studies, CBT was noninferior for all-cause mortality (6.0% vs 6.87%; P-valueNI < .001), non-inferior and superior for major bleeding (4.9% vs 11%; P-valueNI < .001 and P < .001 for superiority).

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Pulmonary Embolism* / therapy
  • Thrombectomy* / methods
  • Thrombolytic Therapy* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Fibrinolytic Agents