Coping strategies, resilience and quality of life: reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic among Romanian physicians

Hum Resour Health. 2024 May 7;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00909-w.

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented multiple psychological challenges for healthcare workers, such as anxiety, depression, burnout, and substance use disorders. In this research, we investigate the different ways Romanian physicians dealt with the difficult period of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also analyze how positive and negative stress-reducing strategies, as well as demographic variables, affect their psychological resilience and quality of life. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of how physicians coped with the unprecedented global health challenges.

Methods: We carried out a national cross-sectional study of 265 physicians in Romania between January 2021 and January 2022 using a web-based questionnaire. The study employed a web-based questionnaire to assess coping mechanisms using the COPE inventory, resilience through the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 (CD-RISC 25), and quality of life via the WHOQOL-BREF scale. The COPE inventory, consisting of 60 items across 15 subscales, categorizes coping strategies into problem-focused, emotion-focused, and dysfunctional types, with each item rated on a 4-point scale. The CD-RISC 25 measures resilience on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100. WHOQOL-BREF assesses quality of life through 26 items in 4 domains: physical, mental, social relations, and environmental, scored from 1 to 5 and converted to a 0-100 scale for domain scores. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were employed to discern the intricate relationships between coping strategies, resilience levels, quality of life dimensions, and pertinent demographic factors.

Results: The average CD-RISC score among participants was 66.2. The mean scores for the values for the QOL subscales were 64.0 for physical well-being, 61.7 for psychological well-being, 61.2 for social relationships, and 64.7 for environment. Individuals tend to use problem-focused and emotion-focused coping more than dysfunctional mechanisms, according to the COPE inventory. Problem-focused and emotion-focused coping are positively correlated with resilience, while dysfunctional coping is negatively correlated. Resilience is significantly influenced by gender and professional status, with males and senior specialists reporting higher levels while younger physicians and residents reporting lower levels.

Conclusions: Our data points to specific protective characteristics and some detrimental factors on physicians' resilience and quality of life during the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coping behavior; Cross-sectional studies; Health behavior; Mental health; Physicians; Psychological stress; Quality of life; Resilience.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Adult
  • Burnout, Professional / epidemiology
  • Burnout, Professional / psychology
  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • COVID-19* / psychology
  • Coping Skills
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pandemics
  • Physicians* / psychology
  • Quality of Life* / psychology
  • Resilience, Psychological*
  • Romania
  • SARS-CoV-2*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires