A Model for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate MRI and Risk Factors
- PMID: 38719106
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.035
A Model for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate MRI and Risk Factors
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using prostate MRI and patient risk factors.
Methods: In total, 960 men who underwent MRI from 2015 to 2019 and biopsy either 6 months before or 6 months after MRI were identified. Men diagnosed with csPCa were identified, and csPCa risk was modeled using known patient factors (age, race, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level) and prostate MRI findings (location, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, extraprostatic extension, dominant lesion size, and PSA density). csPCa was defined as Gleason score sum ≥ 7. Using a derivation cohort, a multivariable logistic regression model and a point-based scoring system were developed to predict csPCa. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in a separate independent validation cohort.
Results: Among 960 MRI reports, 552 (57.5%) were from men diagnosed with csPCa. Using the derivation cohort (n = 632), variables that predicted csPCa were Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores of 4 and 5, the presence of extraprostatic extension, and elevated PSA density. Evaluation using the validation cohort (n = 328) resulted in an area under the curve of 0.77, with adequate calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .58). At a risk threshold of >2 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 98.4% and negative predictive value of 78.6% but prevented only 4.3% potential biopsies (0-2 points; 14 of 328). At a higher threshold of >5 points, the model identified csPCa with sensitivity of 89.5% and negative predictive value of 70.1% and avoided 20.4% of biopsies (0-5 points; 67 of 328).
Conclusions: The point-based model reported here can potentially identify a vast majority of men at risk for csPCa, while avoiding biopsy in about 1 in 5 men with elevated PSA levels.
Keywords: Prostate cancer; predictive model; predictive value of testing; prostate MRI; prostate biopsy.
Copyright © 2024 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Multi-institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions.Cancer. 2022 Sep 15;128(18):3287-3296. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34355. Epub 2022 Jul 12. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35819253
-
Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):369-379. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204112. Epub 2021 May 25. Radiology. 2021. PMID: 34032510
-
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31473884
-
Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Apr;7(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 26. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 37640584 Review.
-
The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the Detection, Evaluation, and Surveillance of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa).Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Sep 2;20(10):60. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0926-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31478113 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
