How Social Connectedness Helps Patients Stay Home After Hospital at Home Enrollment: A Mixed Methods Study

Christy J W Ledford; Lauren A Cafferty; Eunice Lee; Hailie C Hayes; Destine C Ede; Brandon P Hodges; Grant C Whitebloom; David W Walsh; Thad Wilkins

doi:10.1007/s11606-024-08785-9

How Social Connectedness Helps Patients Stay Home After Hospital at Home Enrollment: A Mixed Methods Study

J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May 9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08785-9. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Christy J W Ledford¹, Lauren A Cafferty², Eunice Lee³, Hailie C Hayes³, Destine C Ede³, Brandon P Hodges³, Grant C Whitebloom³, David W Walsh³, Thad Wilkins³

Affiliations

¹ Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, USA. Christy.ledford@augusta.edu.
² The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
³ Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, USA.

PMID: 38724740
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08785-9

Abstract

Background: While enrolled in Hospital at Home (HaH) programs, patients rely on their social network to provide supportive behaviors that are routinely provided by hospital staff in the inpatient setting.

Objective: This study investigated how social connectedness is associated with patient outcomes in a HaH program.

Design: The explanatory iterative sequential mixed methods design included an electronic health record review to collect quantitative measures to describe the severity of patient illness and healthcare utilization and then qualitative interviews to explain quantitative findings.

Participants: The quantitative phase included 100 patients (18 years or older) admitted to the hospital who were subsequently enrolled in the HaH program. In the qualitative phase, 33 of the 100 patients participated in semi-structured interviews.

Analysis: Qualitative data was analyzed using the Sort & Sift, Think & Shift method. Integrated analysis included merged data displays of healthcare utilization data and patient descriptions of their care and genogram-type illustrations to enable variable-oriented analysis of structural support. We then examined patient narratives by two variables: life course and care elevation, to understand differences in the trajectories of six subsets of patients as identified by the quantitative data.

Key results: Three factors prompted patients to enroll in HaH: low attention from hospital staff during hospital stay; loneliness and isolation during hospital stay; and family encouragement to enroll. After discharge, social support within the home structure facilitated recovery during HaH. Conversely, HaH patients with limited support within the home were more likely to be readmitted.

Conclusions: Structural social connectedness facilitates patient recovery in HaH. Before enrolling patients in HaH, clinicians should take an in-depth social history, including questions about social/familial roles, household responsibilities, and technology acceptance. Clinicians should engage formal and informal caregivers in these conversations early and communicate a clear picture of what caregivers should do to support the patient through recovery.

Keywords: Care transitions; Hospital-at-home; Social support.