Advocacy and Bioethics: Aspiration, Obligation, and Negotiation

J Clin Ethics. 2024 Summer;35(2):142-146. doi: 10.1086/729418.

Abstract

AbstractA long-standing tenet of healthcare clinical ethics consultation has involved the neutrality of the ethicist. However, recent pressing societal issues have challenged this viewpoint. Perhaps now more than ever before, ethicists are being called upon to take up roles in public health, policy, and other community-oriented endeavors. In this article, I first review the concept of professional advocacy and contrast this conceptualization with the role of patient advocate, utilizing the profession of nursing as an exemplar. Then, I explore the status of advocacy in clinical ethics and how this conversation intersects with the existing professional obligations of the bioethicist, arguing that the goals of ethics consultation and ethical obligations of the clinical ethicist are compatible with the role of professional advocate. Finally, I explore potential barriers to professional advocacy and offer suggestions for a path forward.

MeSH terms

  • Bioethics
  • Ethicists*
  • Ethics Consultation
  • Ethics, Clinical
  • Humans
  • Moral Obligations
  • Negotiating
  • Patient Advocacy*