Evaluation of various obturation techniques with bioceramic sealers in 3D-printed C-shaped canals

BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 12;24(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04334-2.

Abstract

This in vitro study compared various obturation techniques with bioceramic sealers for filling C-shaped 3D-printed replicas. A mandibular molar with a C-shaped root canal with a C1 configuration was obtained. After instrumenting with M3 Pro Gold files (United Dental, Shanghai, China) up to size #30/0.04, a CBCT scan of the tooth was taken. Sixty 3D-printed replicas of the tooth were created. The samples were obturated with EndoSeal TCS sealer (E. TCS; Maruchi, Wonju, Korea) or EndoSeal MTA (E. MTA; Maruchi, Wonju, Korea) (n = 30). The samples in each group were obturated with the following techniques (n = 10): (1) single-cone technique (SC), (2) SC with ultrasonic activation (UA), and (3) cold hydraulic compaction (CHC). Following incubation, the replicas' apical, middle, and coronal thirds were inspected under a digital microscope, and the proportion of filling material and void were calculated. Also, the obturation time and sealer extrusion were recorded. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, LSD post-hoc, and the chi-square tests (α = 0.05). The results indicated that in the apical third, E. TCS-SC, E. TCS-UA, and E. MTA-UA had the lowest void percentage among groups (p < 0.05). In the middle thirds, samples obturated with E. TCS-UA showed a significantly lower void percentage among all groups (p < 0.05). However, in the coronal third, E. TCS-CHC showed the least void percentage (p < 0.05), followed by E. TCS-UA and E. MTA-CHC. The E. TCS-SC and E. TCS-UA were the least time-consuming methods (p < 0.05). Sealer extrusion significantly differed among the groups, with E. MTA-UA and E. TCS-UA showing higher incidence (p = 0.019). It was concluded that E. TCS-UA was the most convenient obturation technique. However, care must be taken when obturating the canals with high flow and ultrasonic activation near the vital anatomical landmarks.

Keywords: Calcium silicate; Mineral trioxide aggregate; Sealer; Ultrasonic.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Compounds
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / methods
  • Dental Pulp Cavity / diagnostic imaging
  • Drug Combinations
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Molar / diagnostic imaging
  • Oxides
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional*
  • Root Canal Filling Materials*
  • Root Canal Obturation* / methods
  • Silicates

Substances

  • Root Canal Filling Materials
  • Drug Combinations
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Oxides
  • mineral trioxide aggregate
  • Aluminum Compounds
  • Silicates