Assessing interstate racial and socioeconomic disparities in newborn screening policies in the United States

Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 29:12:1310516. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1310516. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: This paper explores racial and socioeconomic disparities in newborn screening (NBS) policies across the United States. While inter-state inequality in healthcare policies is often considered a meaningful source of systemic inequity in healthcare outcomes, to the best of our knowledge, no research has explored racial and socioeconomic disparities in newborn screening policies based on state of residence.

Methods: We investigate these disparities by calculating weighted average exposure to specific NBS tests by racial and socioeconomic group. We additionally estimate count models of the number (and type) of NBS conditions screened for by state racial and socioeconomic composition.

Results: Adding to the knowledge base that social determinants of health and health disparities are linked, our analysis surprisingly reveals little evidence of substantial inter-state inequity in newborn screenings along racial and socioeconomic lines.

Discussion: While there is substantial nationwide racial and socioeconomic inequity in terms of infant health, the distribution of state-level policies does not appear to be structured in a manner to be a driver of these disparities. Our findings suggest that efforts to reduce inequities in outcomes related to NBS should shift focus toward the delivery of screening results and follow-up care as discussion builds on expanding NBS to include more conditions and genomic testing.

Keywords: healthcare policy; newborn screening policies; racial inequality; socioeconomic inequality; state policy.

MeSH terms

  • Health Policy*
  • Healthcare Disparities* / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Neonatal Screening*
  • Racial Groups / statistics & numerical data
  • Socioeconomic Disparities in Health
  • Socioeconomic Factors*
  • United States

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.